2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10444-013-9308-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization over geodesics for exact principal geodesic analysis

Abstract: In fields ranging from computer vision to signal processing and statistics, increasing computational power allows a move from classical linear models to models that incorporate non-linear phenomena. This shift has created interest in computational aspects of differential geometry, and solving optimization problems that incorporate non-linear geometry constitutes an important computational task. In this paper, we develop methods for numerically solving optimization problems over spaces of geodesics using numeri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Exp X Ô¤Õ function is a diffeomorphism from any open 0-neighborhood s X c X onto an open X-neighborhood H X G. Therefore, the inverse function Exp ¡1 X Ô¤Õ is well defined on H X . In computer vision, Exp ¡1 X Ô¤Õ is usually called the Riemannian logarithm function [133,56,57,162,160] and is denoted by Log X Ô¤Õ.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Exp X Ô¤Õ function is a diffeomorphism from any open 0-neighborhood s X c X onto an open X-neighborhood H X G. Therefore, the inverse function Exp ¡1 X Ô¤Õ is well defined on H X . In computer vision, Exp ¡1 X Ô¤Õ is usually called the Riemannian logarithm function [133,56,57,162,160] and is denoted by Log X Ô¤Õ.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking derivatives with respect to on both sides of (6.1) and evaluating at 0, we 20 For abstract groups it can be shown that the corresponding ODE is Integrating (6.2) with initial condition J Ô0Õ 0 results in a vector field along the geodesic which is known as the Jacobi field [50, Chapter 5], [160]. In these works the Jacobi field evolution equation is expressed by a second-order equation which takes into account the curvature of the manifold.…”
Section: Reducing To a First-order Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature also includes ideas related to projective dimensionality reduction methods. For instance, the generalization of Principal Components analysis (PCA) via the so-called PGA [28], Geodesic PCA [29], Exact PGA [30], CCA on manifolds [31], Horizontal Dimension Reduction [32] with frame bundles, and an extension of PGA to the product space of Riemannian manifolds, namely, tensor fields [24]. We should note that an important earlier work dealing with a univariate linear model on manifolds (related to geodesic regression) was studied for the group of diffeomorphisms using metrics which were not strictly Riemmanian [33, 34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most closely related are ideas related to projective dimensionality reduction methods. For instance, the generalization of Principal Components analysis (PCA) via the so-called Principal Geodesic Analysis (PGA) [9], Geodesic PCA [20], Exact PGA [33], Horizontal Dimension Reduction [32] with frame bundles, and an extension of PGA to the product space of Riemannian manifolds, namely, tensor fields [36]. It is important to note that except the non-parametric method of [34], most of these strategies focus on one rather than two sets of random variables (as is the case in CCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%