2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40033-018-0161-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization to Develop Multiple Response Microstructure and Hardness of Ductile Iron Casting by using GRA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the distinctive coefficient doesn't affect the rank of the grey relation coefficient 38 . In this work, the value of the distinctive coefficient is taken as 0.5 as other authors more prefer it 39 .…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysis (Gra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the distinctive coefficient doesn't affect the rank of the grey relation coefficient 38 . In this work, the value of the distinctive coefficient is taken as 0.5 as other authors more prefer it 39 .…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysis (Gra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Senapati et al [22] analysed the influence of process parameters on multiple responses in EDM using the methods of TOPSIS and PCA, and they concluded that the expected process responses were obtained by using these methods. Kabnure et al [23] verified by experiments that Taguchi and GRA were suitable to optimize metallographic structure and hardness. However, TOPSIS method cannot effectively distinguish the similarity among the different schemes, and it is difficult to ensure correctly decisionmaking when the data are selected from a limited sample without typical distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%