2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.00246
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimize cooling-by-measurement by reinforcement learning

Jia-shun Yan,
Jun Jing

Abstract: Cooling by the conditional measurement demonstrates a transparent advantage over that by the unconditional counterpart on the average-population-reduction rate. This advantage, however, is blemished by few percentage of the successful probability of finding the detector system in the measured state. In this work, we propose an optimized architecture to cool down a target resonator, which is initialized as a thermal state, using an interpolation of the conditional and unconditional measurement strategies. Analo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When those dynamics can be arbitrarily controlled, the system can always trivially be cooled; this is because adding an auxiliary system, performing an arbitrary joint interaction, then ignoring or measuring the arbitrary system allows one to enact an arbitrary quantum channel on a given quantum system to generate any desired state [63] and strongly violates the assumptions of HBAC. The HBAC can also be replaced by any other procedure that helps to serially cool a quantum system toward its ground state, including other measurement-based protocols [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Third, HBAC protocols have recently been shown to potentially benefit from the presence of environmental noise [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When those dynamics can be arbitrarily controlled, the system can always trivially be cooled; this is because adding an auxiliary system, performing an arbitrary joint interaction, then ignoring or measuring the arbitrary system allows one to enact an arbitrary quantum channel on a given quantum system to generate any desired state [63] and strongly violates the assumptions of HBAC. The HBAC can also be replaced by any other procedure that helps to serially cool a quantum system toward its ground state, including other measurement-based protocols [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Third, HBAC protocols have recently been shown to potentially benefit from the presence of environmental noise [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this naive picture is too simplistic, as it requires n ideal binary-outcome measurements to purify n qubits. Alternative measurement-based purification schemes exist that require many measurements or only converge toward the purest state [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], such as a recent idea that proposes to perform ?n measurements on a single auxiliary qubit to purify n qubits (with some finite success probability that decays exponentially with n) [29] and one that seeks to reduce the number of measurements by using techniques from reinforcement learning [30]. In comparison, our method can completely purify n qubits with a single binary measurement (and arbitrarily high success probability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%