2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18040967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimize the Coverage Probability of Prediction Interval for Anomaly Detection of Sensor-Based Monitoring Series

Abstract: Effective anomaly detection of sensing data is essential for identifying potential system failures. Because they require no prior knowledge or accumulated labels, and provide uncertainty presentation, the probability prediction methods (e.g., Gaussian process regression (GPR) and relevance vector machine (RVM)) are especially adaptable to perform anomaly detection for sensing series. Generally, one key parameter of prediction models is coverage probability (CP), which controls the judging threshold of the test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precision, was quantified with the Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP) and the Mean Prediction Interval Width (MPIW) (Pang et al, 2018) were also computed. The MPIW measures the average width between the upper (u(D i ))…”
Section: Forecast Skill Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision, was quantified with the Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP) and the Mean Prediction Interval Width (MPIW) (Pang et al, 2018) were also computed. The MPIW measures the average width between the upper (u(D i ))…”
Section: Forecast Skill Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forecast uncertainties were analysed with the Mean Prediction Interval Width (MPIW) and the Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP) (Pang et al, 2018). The PICP computes the percentage of time the observed variable falls within a chosen prediction interval.…”
Section: Forecasting and Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, prediction-based algorithms primarily detect anomalies by comparing the measured data with the output data predicted by models. Prediction-based algorithms rely on pre-trained models, require no a priori knowledge, are independent of labels, and can detect anomalies in real time [12,13]; as a result, they are more applicable to anomaly detection compared to the aforementioned algorithms. Hence, a prediction-based algorithm is employed in this study to detect abnormal storage battery conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%