2007
DOI: 10.2172/1061886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized bunch patterns for d-Au in RHIC Run-8

Abstract: With experience from previous runs we expect instabilities at transition to be the dominant intensity limiting effect for d-Au operation in Run-8. The beam intensity stability threshold is lowered by electron clouds, and the electron cloud density depends on the bunch pattern. We review bunch the pattern optimization in light of the operational experience in Run-7, and optimize the pattern for operation with two different species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stars with planets (SWPs) have been shown to be more metal-rich as a group when compared to similar stars without detected planets (non-SWPs) for nearby stars, found with the Doppler method (Valenti and Fischer 2005), and for stars in the Kepler field (Ji and Fischer 2015), found with the photometric transit method. SWPs and non-SWPs have also been reported to differ in vsini (Gonzalez 2008;Gonzalez et al 2010;Takeda et al 2010;Gonzalez 2011), but others have failed to confirm this (Israelian et al 2009;Alves et al 2010;Delgado Mena et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stars with planets (SWPs) have been shown to be more metal-rich as a group when compared to similar stars without detected planets (non-SWPs) for nearby stars, found with the Doppler method (Valenti and Fischer 2005), and for stars in the Kepler field (Ji and Fischer 2015), found with the photometric transit method. SWPs and non-SWPs have also been reported to differ in vsini (Gonzalez 2008;Gonzalez et al 2010;Takeda et al 2010;Gonzalez 2011), but others have failed to confirm this (Israelian et al 2009;Alves et al 2010;Delgado Mena et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides their pharmacological and therapeutic importance, most SLs function in a wide range of protective activities in plants (Padilla-Gonzalez et al, 2016). The main protective roles are as anti-herbivores (Burnett et al, 1974;Picman, 1986) and antimicrobials (Rodriguez et al, 1976) or as plant growth regulators, e.g., inhibiting the growth of competing plants (Kanchan and Jayachandra, 1980;Picman and Picman, 1984;Kelsey and Locken, 1987;Fischer et al, 1989;Fischer and Kathe, 2007). Some SLs are phytotoxic against certain species (McCahon et al, 1973;Fischer et al, 1989;Macías et al 1996;Andolfi et al, 2013;Miranda et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%