SAE Technical Paper Series 2002
DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Carburized Steel Fatigue Performance as Assessed with Gear and Modified Brugger Fatigue Tests

Abstract: The effectiveness of three different techniques, designed to improve the bending fatigue life in comparison to conventionally processed gas-carburized 8620 steel, were evaluated with modified Brugger bending fatigue specimens and actual ring and pinion gears. The bending fatigue samples were machined from forged gear blanks from the same lot of material used for the pinion gear tests, and all processing of laboratory samples and gears was done together. Fatigue data were obtained on standard as-carburized part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both alloys, the retained austenite fraction increased slightly from the surface inward to a given depth where it reached a maximum before the fraction decreased with increasing depth. This subsurface maximum in retained austenite has been reported previously (12,13). Notably, in the steel grades that were studied in this research, the carburizing treatments and cold-treatment produced substantial variation in the retained austenite levels.…”
Section: Carburizing Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In both alloys, the retained austenite fraction increased slightly from the surface inward to a given depth where it reached a maximum before the fraction decreased with increasing depth. This subsurface maximum in retained austenite has been reported previously (12,13). Notably, in the steel grades that were studied in this research, the carburizing treatments and cold-treatment produced substantial variation in the retained austenite levels.…”
Section: Carburizing Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This method consists of choosing the first maximum applied stress at an estimated value of fatigue strength and the next maximum stress based on whether the previous specimen failed before runout (defined number of cycles without failure). For this work, the first maximum applied stress was approximately twice the value of the yield stress of the 20MnCr5 and was the approximate endurance limit of previous fatigue tests of carburized SAE 8620 [10]. The first maximum stress for all the alloys was 1000 MPa.…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Showing Brugger Specimen Geometry Used For Bending Fatigue Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[25,26,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]) as well as test performed on notched specimen (e.g. [43][44][45]).…”
Section: Gear Testing For Tooth Root Bending Fatiguementioning
confidence: 99%