2021 International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icacite51222.2021.9404732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Classification of Firewall Log Data using Heterogeneous Ensemble Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the benchmark model achieved a higher accuracy of 99.93%. Sharma et al [23] utilized a Heterogeneous ensemble model and obtained a Precision of 91%, Recall of 82%, and F1 score of 85%. The reported accuracy in their paper stands at an impressive 99.8%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the benchmark model achieved a higher accuracy of 99.93%. Sharma et al [23] utilized a Heterogeneous ensemble model and obtained a Precision of 91%, Recall of 82%, and F1 score of 85%. The reported accuracy in their paper stands at an impressive 99.8%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the study indicate that KNN achieved the highest accuracy rate of 100% among the algorithms used. While the previous works discussed were conducted on different datasets, Ertam et al [20], AL-Behadili [21], Rahman et al [22], and Sharma et al [23] all researched the same dataset, which is a public network log obtained from Firat University and contains 65,532 instances. The best accuracy rate among these works was achieved by using a combination of machine learning algorithms, including DT, SVM, One Rule (One R), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and ZeroR.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best accuracy of 99.839% was obtained using the DT model. Likewise, Sharma et al [16] used the same dataset and set of 11 features to train their models. In this study, they used five algorithms, LR, KNN, DT, SVM, and stochastic gradient descent classifier.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have explored the utilization of firewall event logs to uncover meaningful patterns. Sharma et al [11] presented an optimized solution for classifying firewall data packets using machine learning. Their study involved the analysis of 65,532 instances of log files, employing advanced ensemble models with five well-known machine learning classification algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed framework in this paper faces several challenges in light of existing studies that leverage firewall event logs to uncover meaningful patterns. Notable works in this domain include Sharma et al [11] optimization for classifying firewall data packets using machine learning, where an ensemble model achieved a precision value of 91% and an accuracy score of 99.8% based on the analysis of 65,532 log files. Jin et al [12] integrated machine learning into decision tree filtering rules, utilizing optimized C4.5 algorithms to predict optimal rankings for firewall filtering rule table attributes, resulting in enhanced firewall efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%