2019
DOI: 10.1002/num.22407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized composite finite difference schemes for atmospheric flow modeling

Abstract: In this paper, we use some finite difference methods in order to solve an atmospheric flow problem described by an advection-diffusion equation. This flow problem was solved by Clancy using forward-time central space (FTCS) scheme and is challenging to simulate due to large errors in phase and amplitude which are generated especially over long propagation times. Clancy also derived stability limits for FTCS scheme. We use Von Neumann stability analysis and the approach of Hindmarsch et al. which is an improved… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our methods also bear some resemblance to the composite methods introduced and used by Fromm [43] and others [44–47] for hyperbolic equations such as the advection equation to reduce dissipative and dispersive errors at the same time. They usually apply different known methods such as the Lax–Wendroff and leapfrog in subsequent time steps, or the linear combination of these schemes, thus these methods are also different from ours.…”
Section: The Properties Of the New Three‐stage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our methods also bear some resemblance to the composite methods introduced and used by Fromm [43] and others [44–47] for hyperbolic equations such as the advection equation to reduce dissipative and dispersive errors at the same time. They usually apply different known methods such as the Lax–Wendroff and leapfrog in subsequent time steps, or the linear combination of these schemes, thus these methods are also different from ours.…”
Section: The Properties Of the New Three‐stage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, in the case of those methods matrix exponentials are calculated, while we do not even need to use matrices at all, thus there are crucial differences compared to our methods. The new methods also bear some resemblance to the composite methods introduced by Fromm [ 53 ] more than five decades ago, which were also used by others [ 54–57 ] for hyperbolic equations, such as the advection equation, to reduce dissipative and dispersive errors at the same time. Composite in their case usually means that different known methods such as the Lax–Wendroff and leapfrog or the linear combination of these are applied in subsequent time steps, thus these methods are also different from ours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For its part, other advances have been made in designing and applying finite difference schemes, including the corresponding stability analysis of these schemes. Appadu presents in [6,7] different schemes to numerically solve the 1D advection-diffusion equation with very satisfactory results. In addition, the work presented in [8] shows a complete stability analysis, obtaining stability regions of each of the proposed methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%