2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-021-01564-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized differential evolution algorithm for solving DEM material calibration problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, with the development of DEM models and computational resources, DEMs have been used by scholars to study the crack/damage behavior of the coal pillar [18][19][20]. Zhu et al [21] used PFC to study the deformation characteristics, failure behavior, and stress distribution of the combined support column (CSP) of the residual coal pillar and filling body, and evaluated its stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the development of DEM models and computational resources, DEMs have been used by scholars to study the crack/damage behavior of the coal pillar [18][19][20]. Zhu et al [21] used PFC to study the deformation characteristics, failure behavior, and stress distribution of the combined support column (CSP) of the residual coal pillar and filling body, and evaluated its stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some parameters operate independently, others are intricately interlinked. As a result, designating a crossover strategy for DEM calibration does not squarely fit into traditional lower or upper crossover frameworks 22 . Therefore, in this study, 70% of the generated population will be created by crossover.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Levenberg–Marquardt method, known for its aptitude in residual minimization 17 , is complemented by techniques such as the Nelder-Mead simplex 18 and the weighted least squares approach 19 . Other prominent strategies include the Gauss–Newton algorithm 20 , enhanced simulated annealing algorithm 21 , Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm 22 , and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) 23 . Notably, genetic algorithms have gained traction, highlighting the wide array of computational approaches leveraged in this field 16 , 23 , 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method is automatically implemented, thereby avoiding the laborious and time-consuming manual operation, and showing considerable potential for practical applications. Ji 72,73 proposed an optimized differential evolution calibration method that automatically calibrates the microscopic parameters to the target macroscopic parameters. Simulation experiments demonstrated that the macroscopic parameters, such as Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, uniaxial compressive strength, and direct tensile strength, can be calibrated with a relative error of less than 5% .…”
Section: Evolutionary Algorithms Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%