Optimized forest planning: allocation of log storage yards in the Amazonian sustainable forest management area

Abstract

In Amazonian native forest management, forest road infrastructures, such as log storage yards and skid trails, are the most expensive attributes and are responsible for the significant environmental impacts with selective tree felling. Road optimization is crucial for reducing environmental impacts and production costs and is strongly linked to the optimal location of storage yards, which are essential to forest road planning. Considering the present problem and the current solutions available, this case study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and eventual gains of optimized forest planning (OFP), as compared to traditional forest planning (TFP). The TFP method is currently used most frequently by forest companies in the Amazon region. The study area of 126.41 ha belongs to the National Forest (NAFO) Saracá-Taquera, Forest Management Unit II (FMU-II), Annual Production Unit (APU) 04/2018, and Work Unit (WU) 2. For the analysis, two areas were defined for exploration: the first was explored using the OFP mathematical model (57.75 ha) and the second followed the TFP plan of the company (68.66 ha). Plans and executions for both areas were compared. The OFP model significantly reduced the Euclidean distances between tree and yards, with only 0.23 km difference in the amount of planned forest roads, when compared to TFP. Additionally, OFP demonstrated a higher productivity (trees.h -1 and m 3 .h -1 ), a reduction of skid distance (by an average of 17.16%), and reduced the cost of log skidding (m 3 by 25.76%). Thus, this study proved that OFP is a viable solution that can be adopted by companies to increase productivity. Selective logging is intended to only remove trees of commercial value. Its use is associated with forest management techniques and is referenced in the current legislation (Implementing rule no.

Rethinking Legal Criteria for Assessing Compensation for Rural Land Expropriation: Towards a European Institutional Framework

“…For land management purposes, it is very interesting to observe where there is heterogeneity in the assignment of the weights in the panel of experts, because this allows us to interact among the experts by conducting a second round of surveys, or by expanding the sample of experts with greater knowledge in those attributes where greater heterogeneity is observed. However, Harker [101] developed a method to replace inconsistent values, using the error matrix [102].…”

Effects of forest roads and an assessment of their disturbance of the natural enviroment based on GIS spatial multi-criteria analysis: case study of the University Forest of Taxiarchis, Chalkidiki, Greece

“…An integrated approach to the environmental impact of forest roads is also important for developing decision support systems (DSSs) for the construction of new forest roads (Jaafari et al 2015). The optimization of the spatial distribution of the forest road network leads to the minimization of its environmental impact (Stergiadou et al 2003) and at the same time promotes its other functions (Silva et al 2020;Bapapour et al 2018). According to Stückelberger (2006b), the development of an optimum forest road network relies on three main factors: the life cycle cost, the ecological effects, and finally the natural environment attractiveness.…”

A Preliminary Validation and Assessment of a GIS Approach Related to Precision Forest Harvesting in Central Italy

“…This type of two-step procedure makes it difficult to predict what could impact forest operations on the local environment, economy, and social aspects in the long term since only the EHP will contain specific procedures that are applied in the field. Although the procedures, approaches, and application of the best practices will be in compliance with the criteria of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) [23][24][25] and Sustainable Forest Operations (SFOs), such as the Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) [26,27], it is still unknown what the applied harvesting system is until the executive project is delivered. Furthermore, this kind of decision derives from an in situ analysis carried out by the local forest engineer, who is the developer of the EHP.…”