2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18113884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Gateway Placement for Interference Cancellation in Transmit-Only LPWA Networks

Abstract: We study the placement of gateways in a low-power wide-area sensor network, when the gateways perform interference cancellation and when the model of the residual error of interference cancellation is proportional to the power of the packet being canceled. For the case of two sensor nodes sending packets that collide, by which we mean overlap in time, we deduce a symmetric two-crescent region wherein a gateway can decode both collided packets. For a large network of many sensors and multiple gateways, we propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, LoRaWAN gateways' deployment leads to high capital and operational cost, including a LoRaWAN gateway and leasing and maintenance costs. Therefore, network planning is a challenge that affects QoS, capital, and operating costs [26]. In the following subsection, we review state-of-the-art results on recently proposed networking planning mechanisms for LoRaWAN.…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, LoRaWAN gateways' deployment leads to high capital and operational cost, including a LoRaWAN gateway and leasing and maintenance costs. Therefore, network planning is a challenge that affects QoS, capital, and operating costs [26]. In the following subsection, we review state-of-the-art results on recently proposed networking planning mechanisms for LoRaWAN.…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because an inefficient network planning scheme leads to the void area where IoT devices may not have connectivity to a gateway [25]. This issue affects IoT applications' performance in terms of QoS and network operation in terms of CAPEX and OPEX [26]. Aside from that, future IoT applica-tion verticals foresee a huge amount of IoT devices per square meter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in each work, we discuss their advantages and disadvantages to operate in a dynamic IoT scenario. Tian et al [20] investigated LPWAN gateways placement for a scenario with interference cancellation. This work developed two greedy algorithms in order to find the optimized gateways location.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, deploying LoRaWAN gateways lead to high Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX), including the cost of a LoRaWAN gateway, of its leasing, and maintenance. Hence, network planning, such as the LoRaWAN gateways placement model, is a critical problem that influences Quality of Service (QoS) as well as the CAPEX and OPEX [20]. While previous research [20][21][22][23][24][25] has examined LoRaWAN gateway placement problems, to the best of our knowledge, none have considered the minimum network performance along with cost efficiency [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the capacity of high-speed wireless telecommunications such as Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11 protocol standards) is too large in the category of wireless local area networking. Since a data rate with very small capacity is adequate and reasonable, we selected a low-power, wide-area (LPWA) network [18][19][20] that allows long-range wireless telecommunication at a low bit rate with low-power consumption, which is suitable for the Internet-of-Things (IoT) [21][22][23][24], i.e., objects that are connected to the internet. Then, the positioning system data are transferred by LPWA to a cloud data server every several minutes, where the dataset is accumulated; its unit data are composed of digit numbers for time, longitude, and latitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%