2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318481110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized gene editing technology for Drosophila melanogaster using germ line-specific Cas9

Abstract: The ability to engineer genomes in a specific, systematic, and costeffective way is critical for functional genomic studies. Recent advances using the CRISPR-associated single-guide RNA system (Cas9/sgRNA) illustrate the potential of this simple system for genome engineering in a number of organisms. Here we report an effective and inexpensive method for genome DNA editing in Drosophila melanogaster whereby plasmid DNAs encoding short sgRNAs under the control of the U6b promoter are injected into transgenic fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
402
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(417 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
402
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We generated two constructs in which Cas9 was under the control of the nos promoter, which is active in the male and female germ line (15), and the nos 3′ UTR, which targets protein synthesis to the germ cells (15). These constructs are similar to those used by two previous studies to provide Cas9 transgenically (8,10). We also generated two novel constructs: (i) act-cas9, in which Cas9 is fused to the ubiquitously expressed actin5C (act) promoter and the SV40 3′ UTR, and (ii) UAScas9, which has yeast upstream-activating sequences (UAS), allowing expression under control of the Gal4 transcriptional activator (16), and the p10 3′ UTR, which promotes efficient translation (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We generated two constructs in which Cas9 was under the control of the nos promoter, which is active in the male and female germ line (15), and the nos 3′ UTR, which targets protein synthesis to the germ cells (15). These constructs are similar to those used by two previous studies to provide Cas9 transgenically (8,10). We also generated two novel constructs: (i) act-cas9, in which Cas9 is fused to the ubiquitously expressed actin5C (act) promoter and the SV40 3′ UTR, and (ii) UAScas9, which has yeast upstream-activating sequences (UAS), allowing expression under control of the Gal4 transcriptional activator (16), and the p10 3′ UTR, which promotes efficient translation (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kondo and Ueda (8) expressed both Cas9 and gRNA from transgenes stably integrated into the genome, but all other studies have used microinjection of expression plasmids or of in vitro-transcribed RNA into embryos to deliver one or both CRISPR/Cas components (5)(6)(7)(9)(10)(11). Much of the currently available evidence suggests that transgenic provision of Cas9 increases rates of germ-line transmission substantially (8,10,11). However, the influence of different regulatory sequences within cas9 transgenes on the rate of mutagenesis and on the location where mutations are generated within the organism has not been evaluated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51324). The DNA fragments for the guide RNAs were subcloned in the BbsI-digested U6b-sgRNA-short (a kind gift from N. Perrimon) (Ren et al 2013) vector. The following primers were annealed to generate the DNA fragments for guide RNAs: ephrin I95 -1 (5 ′ -CTTCGATGTACCAAAAAAGGAAGA-3 ′ and 5 ′ -AAACTCTTCCTTTTTTGGTACATC-3 ′ ), ephrin I95 -2 (5 ′ -CTT CGGAATCAAATGATATTAATT-3 ′ and 5 ′ -AAACAATTAATA TCATTTGATTCC-3 ′ ), Eph-myc-1 (5 ′ -CTTCGACGGTAATCA TATTTTGGA-3´and 5´-AAACTCCAAAATATGATTACCG TC-3´), and Eph-myc-2 (5´CTTCGTACGTAAGGTGCGG TATTC-3 ′ and 5 ′ -AAACGAATACCGCACCTTACGTAC-3 ′ ).…”
Section: Generation Of Knockout and Knock-in Constructs By Crispr/cas9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the atg2 RNAi was confirmed (Supplementary Figure S3). Using the CRISPRassociated single-guide RNA system (Cas9/sgRNA), 41 we generated a large deletion (2164 bp) in the exon region of the atg2 gene. The homozygous deletion was pupal lethal.…”
Section: Atg2 Functioned Downstream Of the Tlk-mediated Pcdmentioning
confidence: 99%