We investigated thermal oxide layers of different thickness on (100) and (111) silicon substrates by STEM/EELS to determine the stoichiometry profiles and compared these with stoichiometry profiles of plate-like and octahedral oxide precipitates in silicon. It was found that the stoichiometry of SiO x (x = 2) cannot be reached if the oxide layer thickness is lower than 10 nm for thermal oxides grown at 900 • C. This is due to an interface layer of equal maximum slope of x for all oxide layers. The slope of x is the change in stoichiometry with position and was obtained from fitting by sigmoid functions. Similar results were found for the oxide precipitates in silicon. However, there are arguments which question the slope determined via the low loss EEL spectra and the maximum x value could be closer to 2 in reality. On a sample with an oxide layer of 13.9 nm thickness we compared stoichiometry profiles obtained from the plasmon region and the Si-K 2,3 and O-K ionization edges. The width of the interface measured on stoichiometry profiles decreases with increasing energy loss and is lowest for the O-K ionization edge with a width of 1. In a previous work, we found that both the interface between an oxide precipitate and the surrounding silicon matrix and the interface between a silicon substrate and a thermal oxide layer are of the same nature.1 In both cases, between SiO 2 existing in the center of the precipitate and in the oxide layer and Si of the matrix and the substrate a suboxide region of 2-3 nm was found. These results were obtained by electron energy loss spectrometry (EELS) carried out by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). In the low loss region, it is possible to distinguish between Si, SiO, and SiO 2 which all exhibit different maxima of the plasmon loss energy. By deconvolution, the local composition of the phase can be determined with the help of reference spectra of the three components.The stoichiometry of the oxide precipitates (SiO x ) was debated for a long time and application of different methods on different samples containing oxygen precipitates resulted in different values for x ranging from 1 to 2. Recently, it was demonstrated by applying several direct and indirect methods that the oxide precipitates consist of SiO 2 .2 Inspired by the results in Ref. 1 and 2, a layer model was proposed explaining the different experimental values for x for oxide precipitates of different geometry.3 Especially, for plate-like precipitates with a small aspect ratio the lower x values could be explained assuming that they consist of SiO 2 surrounded by a 2 nm SiO shell. However, neither is it known until now if all oxide precipitates consist of SiO 2 in the center nor is it known how thick the suboxide region for oxide precipitates grown at different temperature and time is. It needs to be mentioned that the suboxide region is not a layer of SiO composition but a profile of x increasing from the silicon matrix to the SiO 2 core. The impression of a layer just stems from the analysis of ele...