2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized polygonal approximation by dominant point deletion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All contour points (including two candidate contour points) from current point Q j to next candidate contour point P 1 are fitted with least square arc, the centre and radius 1 r of arc are Q j P 1 calculated and obtained. According to the principle of HOUGH transform arc detection, if next to next candidate contour point P 2 belongs to circle which contain the arc Q j P 1 , then the three-dimensional erect taper surface corresponding with next to next candidate contour point P 2 and that corresponding with arc Q j P 1 are intersected at point 1 , it is indicated that arc Q j P 1 and arc P 1 P 2 belong to the same arc, and should be merged, the candidate contour property of the next candidate contour point P 1 is clear, the next to next candidate contour point P 2 is set as next candidate contour point and the calculation is continued and recycled. If…”
Section: Fig 2 Principle Of Projection Height Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All contour points (including two candidate contour points) from current point Q j to next candidate contour point P 1 are fitted with least square arc, the centre and radius 1 r of arc are Q j P 1 calculated and obtained. According to the principle of HOUGH transform arc detection, if next to next candidate contour point P 2 belongs to circle which contain the arc Q j P 1 , then the three-dimensional erect taper surface corresponding with next to next candidate contour point P 2 and that corresponding with arc Q j P 1 are intersected at point 1 , it is indicated that arc Q j P 1 and arc P 1 P 2 belong to the same arc, and should be merged, the candidate contour property of the next candidate contour point P 1 is clear, the next to next candidate contour point P 2 is set as next candidate contour point and the calculation is continued and recycled. If…”
Section: Fig 2 Principle Of Projection Height Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, the absolute value of the difference between 1 r and 3 r namely 2 3 1 r r ε = − is calculated, and 2 ε is compared with threshold T=0.001. If 2 > T ε , then P is set as new next to next candidate contour point, if 2 ≤ T ε , then P is set as new next candidate contour point.…”
Section: Fig 2 Principle Of Projection Height Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiao et al [17] adopted a splitand-merge algorithm for describing curves with robust tolerance. Massod's approach [18], [19] starts from an initial set of dominant points where the integral square error from a given shape is zero and iteratively deletes most redundant dominant points till required approximation is achieved. Kolesnikov's [20] framework treats the problem of the polygonal approximation with a minimum number of approximation segments for a given error bound with L2-norm and the solution is based on searching for the shortest path in a feasibility graph that has been constructed on the vertices of the input curve.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational complexity of the Carmona algorithm is O((m − n d )n), where n is the number of the contour points, m is the number of initial break points, and n d is the number of final dominant points [5]. The computational complexity of the Masood method can be given as O((m − n d )n 2 ) owing to its optimization process [23].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Heuristic approach: these methods construct the approximating polygon using some reasonable geometric or perceptual features of the contours [10] -Parametric approach: these methods take into account a parameter to generate the polygonal approximations [2,4,5,7,18,21,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%