2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-021-00770-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized threshold-based convolutional neural network for plant leaf classification: a challenge towards untrained data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The population size and the maximum iterations were taken as 10 and 25. The introduced BM‐HHO‐CRNN + CSVM was compared with “various existing heuristic‐based algorithms like HHO‐CRNN + CSVM (Heidari et al, 2019), Shark Smell‐based Whale Optimization Algorithm (SS‐WOA)‐CRNN + CSVM (Dudi & Rajesh, 2021), WOA‐CRNN + CSVM (Mirjalili & Lewis, 2016), and Shark Smell Optimization (SSO)‐CRNN + CSVM (Abedinia et al, 2014) and with different conventional classifiers like SVM (Yu et al, 2016), RNN (Dudi & Rajesh, 2021), CNN (Rawat & Wang, 2017), CSVM (Rawat & Wang, 2017; Yu et al, 2016), CRNN (Rawat & Wang, 2017; Rong et al, 2014), and CRNN + CSVM (Rawat & Wang, 2017; Rong et al, 2014; Yu et al, 2016)” to prove the better performance offered by the introduced method for classifying the plant leaf from the trained and untrained data.…”
Section: Computation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population size and the maximum iterations were taken as 10 and 25. The introduced BM‐HHO‐CRNN + CSVM was compared with “various existing heuristic‐based algorithms like HHO‐CRNN + CSVM (Heidari et al, 2019), Shark Smell‐based Whale Optimization Algorithm (SS‐WOA)‐CRNN + CSVM (Dudi & Rajesh, 2021), WOA‐CRNN + CSVM (Mirjalili & Lewis, 2016), and Shark Smell Optimization (SSO)‐CRNN + CSVM (Abedinia et al, 2014) and with different conventional classifiers like SVM (Yu et al, 2016), RNN (Dudi & Rajesh, 2021), CNN (Rawat & Wang, 2017), CSVM (Rawat & Wang, 2017; Yu et al, 2016), CRNN (Rawat & Wang, 2017; Rong et al, 2014), and CRNN + CSVM (Rawat & Wang, 2017; Rong et al, 2014; Yu et al, 2016)” to prove the better performance offered by the introduced method for classifying the plant leaf from the trained and untrained data.…”
Section: Computation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dudi and Rajesh [40] proposed the shark smell-based whale optimization algorithm (SS-WOA), which identifies untrained class data based on the activation function values and classification costs of the CNN model. The method derives a threshold using the activation function value when data are input and identify the input data as untrained class data when the classification cost is less than the threshold.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method improves the classification accuracy by approximately 0.57-4% compared with other classification models in the experiment on plant-leaf datasets. The methods proposed in [13] and [40] increase the computational cost because separate modules (extra layer and algorithm) are added to the CNN model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed method was more successful than AlexNet in the presence of less training data. Dudi and Rajesh [30] performed a DL-based plant identification application using the Swedish and Mendeley dataset. First, they applied pre-processing steps such as median filtering and histogram equalization to the leaves.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%