2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing 3D Irregular Object Packing from 3D Scans Using Metaheuristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, irregular objects instead of cuboids are usually packed in realistic applications, and yielding optimal object sequence and placement for irregular objects according to the visual appearance has aroused extensive interest. Meta-heuristic methods including Tabu Search (TS) [16] and Guided local search (GLS) [17] begin with randomly placed objects and iteratively minimize the objective function by moving objects with collision prevention [4]. Constructive positioning heuristic methods containing Empty Maximal Space (EMS) [18], Maximum Contact Area (MCA) [19] and Heightmap Minimization (HM) [1] pack objects into empty container in the order determined by heuristic rules.…”
Section: A Packing Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, irregular objects instead of cuboids are usually packed in realistic applications, and yielding optimal object sequence and placement for irregular objects according to the visual appearance has aroused extensive interest. Meta-heuristic methods including Tabu Search (TS) [16] and Guided local search (GLS) [17] begin with randomly placed objects and iteratively minimize the objective function by moving objects with collision prevention [4]. Constructive positioning heuristic methods containing Empty Maximal Space (EMS) [18], Maximum Contact Area (MCA) [19] and Heightmap Minimization (HM) [1] pack objects into empty container in the order determined by heuristic rules.…”
Section: A Packing Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Packing planning is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with high complexity. In order to efficiently generate the optimal sequence and placement of objects, heuristic methods [1], [3], [4] with the greedy objective minimize the object stack heights in the packing boxes. Since the greedy search results in sub-optimal solution and high computational cost for object arrangement, data-driven methods [2], [5], [6] employ the reinforcement learning framework for bin packing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the shape of the items is irregular, it is not feasible to find an optimal solution to the problem as the search space is infinite, and only can be solved with approximate solutions. For instance, Zhao et al used a metaheuristic algorithm to estimate a nearoptimal packing mosaic for irregular objects [13]. In this work, the items were represented as meshes and the empty space as a bounding box of the bin.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to optimizing the BPP lies in generating the object packing order and determining the object placement strategy. To maximize the space utilization and minimize the usage number of boxes, conventional packing methods [1,4,5] take advantage of the meta-heuristics to generate the optimal object packing order, such as the genetic algorithm (GA) [6], generally resulting in highly computational cost and relatively low accuracy. Learning-based methods [7,8,9] employing DRL to resolve the BPP have gradually come up in academia, being advantageous in saving computational cost as well as increasing packing accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%