2017
DOI: 10.1503/cjs.005817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy outcomes: Surgical experience or appropriate patient selection?

Abstract: Background: Early reports of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) outcomes have been suboptimal. The literature has confirmed that learning curves influence surgical outcomes. We have 54 months of continuous experience performing ALPPS with strict selection criteria. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the learning curve on ALPPS outcomes. Methods:We retrospectively compared patients who underwent ALPPS between April 2012 and March 2016. Patients were groupe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ALPPS is labeled as a high-risk operation due to its initially reported high morbidity and mortality [31]. However, a learning curve in ALPPS is observed, and things have gone into gradually reverse as improvement of patient selection, interstage management, and ALPPS technique [32,33]. A study of the International ALPPS Registry shows that the 90-day mortality decreases from 17 to 4% in 2015 among 437 patients from 16 centers [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALPPS is labeled as a high-risk operation due to its initially reported high morbidity and mortality [31]. However, a learning curve in ALPPS is observed, and things have gone into gradually reverse as improvement of patient selection, interstage management, and ALPPS technique [32,33]. A study of the International ALPPS Registry shows that the 90-day mortality decreases from 17 to 4% in 2015 among 437 patients from 16 centers [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%