Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2791347.2791368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing continuous queries using update propagation with varying granularities

Abstract: We investigate the possibility to use update propagation methods for optimizing the evaluation of continuous queries. Update propagation allows for the efficient determination of induced changes to derived relations resulting from an explicitly performed base table update. In order to simplify the computation process, we propose the propagation of up-dates with different degrees of granularity which corresponds to an incremental query evaluation with different levels of accuracy. We show how propagation rules … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For writing, InVerDa generates three triggers on each table version: for inserts, deletes, and updates. To not recompute all data of the materialized side after each write operation at the not-materialized side of an SMO, InVerDa adopts an update propagation technique for Datalog rules [2] that results in minimal write operations. For instance, an insert operation ∆ + T (p, A) on the table version T propagated back to the source side of a materialized SPLIT SMO results in the following update rules:…”
Section: Delta Code Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For writing, InVerDa generates three triggers on each table version: for inserts, deletes, and updates. To not recompute all data of the materialized side after each write operation at the not-materialized side of an SMO, InVerDa adopts an update propagation technique for Datalog rules [2] that results in minimal write operations. For instance, an insert operation ∆ + T (p, A) on the table version T propagated back to the source side of a materialized SPLIT SMO results in the following update rules:…”
Section: Delta Code Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%