2015
DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Eating Performance for Older Adults With Dementia Living in Long‐term Care: A Systematic Review

Abstract: This review provided preliminary support for using training and mealtime assistance to optimize eating performance for older adults with dementia in LTC. Future effectiveness studies may focus on training nursing caregivers as interventionists, lengthening intervention duration, and including residents with varying levels of cognitive impairment in diverse cultures. The effectiveness of training combined with mealtime assistance may also be tested to achieve better resident outcomes in eating performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this perspective, interventions to improve mealtime performance should include training nursing assistants and using environmental modifications or mealtime assistance. Nursing staff training programs demonstrate evidence in improving feeding difficulty(37, 38), but most programs focus on the use of feeding skills instead of engagement, interaction and other environmental factors to promote eating performance(39, 40). The strength of evidence for using environmental modifications and mealtime assistance is limited by the strength of study designs(38).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From this perspective, interventions to improve mealtime performance should include training nursing assistants and using environmental modifications or mealtime assistance. Nursing staff training programs demonstrate evidence in improving feeding difficulty(37, 38), but most programs focus on the use of feeding skills instead of engagement, interaction and other environmental factors to promote eating performance(39, 40). The strength of evidence for using environmental modifications and mealtime assistance is limited by the strength of study designs(38).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nursing staff training programs demonstrate evidence in improving feeding difficulty(37, 38), but most programs focus on the use of feeding skills instead of engagement, interaction and other environmental factors to promote eating performance(39, 40). The strength of evidence for using environmental modifications and mealtime assistance is limited by the strength of study designs(38). However, improving dining environment in nursing homes significantly improves meal intake and nutritional status for older adults with dementia(41), and demonstrates the importance of environmental factors at mealtimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, 43% found the quality of the studies weak ( Table 2). Thus, the total quality of the studies reviewed is not significantly different from the findings of other reviews in the nursing journals [42][43][44]. This, for example, depends on the selection and description of the sample.…”
Section: Discussion Dissatisfaction In Study Quality and Samplementioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, the number of staff present and their attentiveness were not able to ensure adequate food intake, indicating that additional factors such as effectiveness of prompts and greater food choice warrant attention. Most staff used prompts in the form of ineffective questions, although some staff did use a recommended approach of direct statements (Coyne & Hoskins, 1997;Liu, Galik, Boltz, Nahm, & Resnick, 2015;Simmons, Alessi, & Schnelle, 2001), albeit not consistently. Effective verbal prompts include direct statements that are simple, clear, and brief single-step instructions, delivered consistently in a calm and reassuring manner (Chang, Brownhill, Bidewell, Johnson, & Ratnayake, 2015;Morris & Volicer, 2001;Van Ort & Phillips, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%