2022
DOI: 10.1002/nsg.12193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing GPR time‐zero adjustment and two‐way travel time wavelet measurements using a realistic three‐dimensional numerical model

Abstract: Time‐zero adjustment or the true ground surface for ground penetrating radar (GPR) applications is a very important aspect and an essential factor in order to position subsurface targets, especially those located at shallow depths, at their true position in depth. As the transmitted and received signals from GPR antennas are affected by the presence of different materials with varying electromagnetic properties, adjusting the time zero appropriately is important, but often not straightforward to position accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DW is very helpful to record as (a) it helps in defining the time‐zero or else, the true ground surface for a GPR survey (Angelis et al., 2022; Diamanti et al., 2018; Kaufmann et al., 2020; Yelf, 2004; Zadhoush & Giannopoulos, 2022), and (b) its use has been highlighted in measurements to derive near‐surface soil properties, for example the variation of soil water content (Grote et al., 2010; Huisman et al., 2003; Klenk, 2012). However, the DW, being the strongest in amplitude response in a GPR record, often saturates or overloads the GPR receiver electronics – which have a finite dynamic range – resulting in large signals being clipped or distorted signals being recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DW is very helpful to record as (a) it helps in defining the time‐zero or else, the true ground surface for a GPR survey (Angelis et al., 2022; Diamanti et al., 2018; Kaufmann et al., 2020; Yelf, 2004; Zadhoush & Giannopoulos, 2022), and (b) its use has been highlighted in measurements to derive near‐surface soil properties, for example the variation of soil water content (Grote et al., 2010; Huisman et al., 2003; Klenk, 2012). However, the DW, being the strongest in amplitude response in a GPR record, often saturates or overloads the GPR receiver electronics – which have a finite dynamic range – resulting in large signals being clipped or distorted signals being recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%