2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Locations for Chlorine Booster Stations in Small Water Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, multi-objective optimization was also applied to solve the WQC problem, where Prasad et al [14] used a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) to minimize the total disinfectant dose and simultaneously maximize the water demand within specified residual limits. A comprehensive review of the literature on the optimization of booster chlorination systems can be found in the recent works by Islam et al [15], and Mala-Jetmarova et al [16].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, multi-objective optimization was also applied to solve the WQC problem, where Prasad et al [14] used a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) to minimize the total disinfectant dose and simultaneously maximize the water demand within specified residual limits. A comprehensive review of the literature on the optimization of booster chlorination systems can be found in the recent works by Islam et al [15], and Mala-Jetmarova et al [16].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…min n P P ≥ (38) …where Q ⊆ R D is the decision space (that is the set of all commercially available pipe diameters); c is the cost function associated with the problem; ΔPn is the head deficit at each network node; and D, N, and L are the number of links to be designed (decision variables), the number of nodes, and the number of loops in the network, respectively. Equation 35describes the conservation of mass while Equation 36represents the conservation of energy, where the head loss along each pipe is given by Equation 37, with CW being the Hazen-Williams loss coefficient.…”
Section: Cosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the studies set scheduling patterns by groups of six hours [32]; thus, the operation of each CBS is described by four separate constant mass injections along 24 h [32,[36][37][38]. Some research on CBS focuses on mathematical models to propose the optimal location and injection dosage in the WDS, and others use Artificial Intelligence (AI) [39]. Using AI and informatics allows the simulation of several scenarios before construction investment of the CBS, thus saving money and time in project development [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%