2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Magnetoencephalographic Imaging Estimation of Language Lateralization for Simpler Language Tasks

Abstract: Language Lateralization in MEG we identified excellent concordance (100%) with IAP for VG + NWR + PN composite LI, high concordance for PN alone (87.5%), and moderate concordance for NWR alone (66.7%). These findings provide task options for non-invasive language mapping with MEGI that can be calibrated for language abilities of individual patients. Results also demonstrate that more accurate estimates can be obtained by combining laterality estimates obtained from multiple tasks. MEGI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stimuli varied in concreteness (e.g., "ball" versus "music"), familiarity (e.g., "store" versus "knob"), and imageability (e.g., "car" versus "story"). E-Prime 1 was used to deliver the stimuli via headphones and verbal responses were spoken into a microphone and recorded for post-processing analysis (Findlay et al, 2013;Hinkley et al, 2020). The task was performed during MEG recordings as part of a large protocol studying language processing dynamics in PPA patients (Borghesani et al, 2020b(Borghesani et al, , 2021, however, the current study focused on fine-grained analysis of the behavioral performance during the verb generation task.…”
Section: Behavioral Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimuli varied in concreteness (e.g., "ball" versus "music"), familiarity (e.g., "store" versus "knob"), and imageability (e.g., "car" versus "story"). E-Prime 1 was used to deliver the stimuli via headphones and verbal responses were spoken into a microphone and recorded for post-processing analysis (Findlay et al, 2013;Hinkley et al, 2020). The task was performed during MEG recordings as part of a large protocol studying language processing dynamics in PPA patients (Borghesani et al, 2020b(Borghesani et al, , 2021, however, the current study focused on fine-grained analysis of the behavioral performance during the verb generation task.…”
Section: Behavioral Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it is likely that using TMS frequencies matching with the natural frequency band of endogenous brain oscillations increases the probability of TMS pulses to interfere with cortical processing at the appropriate timing ( Thut and Miniussi, 2009 ; Miniussi et al, 2013 ; Nettekoven et al, 2021 ). Indeed, evidence from MEG studies has associated language-related processing with brain oscillations in higher frequency bands, such as the beta (17–25 Hz) and the low gamma band (26–50 Hz) ( Hirata et al, 2010 ; Hinkley et al, 2020 ; Youssofzadeh et al, 2020 ). It is also worth noting that different language brain regions may be sensitive to different stimulation frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given some of the advantages of MEG over fMRI in patients with glioma, at some centers, MEG has become the preferred preoperative functional imaging modality. MEG has been used to determine laterality preoperatively ( Findlay et al, 2012 ; Hinkley et al, 2020 ) and demonstrates good spatial concordance with DES for functional language sites ( Frye et al, 2009 ; Hirata et al, 2010 ). Moreover, there is evidence that MEG can play a complementary role to DES, especially in the white matter.…”
Section: Invasive and Non-invasive Techniques For Mapping And Preserv...mentioning
confidence: 99%