the project, subject to spatial precedence and various operational constraints (Espinoza , 2012).It is common practice in the mining industry to represent a mineral deposit as a set of three-dimensional blocks, known as a block model. The production scheduling then consists of defining when, if ever, to extract each of these blocks and the destination to which they should be sent.There are two methodologies that are mainly used to optimize this form of scheduling, namely 'block-level resolution ' and 'aggregation' (Elkington and Durham, 2011). The block-level resolution optimization approach was first proposed by Thys Johnson (1968) and evolved to be known as direct block scheduling (DBS). The aggregation approach splits the scheduling problem into several smaller sub-processes which include, for example, the definition and optimization of the ultimate pit, intermediate pushback selection, and finally, production scheduling. This last approach became known as the conventional planning approach (Elkington and Durham, 2011;Morales et al., 2015).Research into DBS and its use as a method for solving scheduling problems in open pit mine planning has recently been gaining increasing interest as an alternative to the conventional methodology, which is based on nested pits. In DBS, however, an entire production plan can be obtained in only one step, which can maximize the economic value of a mining project.Among the advantages offered by this method is that it considers the temporality of the problem and the opportunity cost when sequencing mining blocks, i.e., it searches for the next best block to mine considering its implication for other periods. As such, it is able to present users with the best NPV possible, subject to constraints such as operation, capacity, and metallurgy.However, this methodology is still being developed, and all of the existing operational constraints have not yet been fully implemented in the method, which can result in unfeasible long-term production plans. To address this gap, this paper proposes using DBS as a tool for medium-term planning.Medium-term planning is important for operational purposes; it also encompasses the quality and quantity of intermediate-period Three different approaches to medium-term planning were compared. First, a renowned software package that is used in the mineral industry was used to execute conventional medium-term scheduling. Then, DBS was used to perform the same task. Finally, a combination of DBS and conventional scheduling was tested. Using the results provided by DBS, sectorization of specific areas was included in the conventional methodology to guide the scheduling and thus allow this combination to produce real benefits, even for large projects.Block scheduling, open pit mining, mine planning, production scheduling.