2019
DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.09.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing perioperative strategies to maximize success with prepectoral breast reconstruction

Abstract: Implant based reconstruction is still the most commonly employed method of post mastectomy reconstruction in the United States and internationally. Mastectomy techniques are improving, and adjuncts such as tissue perfusion technology and biologic implants allow for re-evaluation of traditional reconstructive methods. Subpectoral implant placement is used in a large majority of patients undergoing implant based reconstruction. However, with the advent of acellular dermal matrix (ADM), a "sling" for the expander… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the mastectomy skin flap was thin or viability judged to be suboptimal clinically, a tissue expander was placed in the subpectoral plane. Tumor size or oncologic characteristics did not influence the decision to perform pre-pectoral versus subpectoral reconstruction, the determinant of implant placement location and single versus staged approach is determined by mastectomy skin flap viability, which is supported by the literature [16,17]. Anesthetic was administered using a strict total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) protocol along with administration of at least two anti-emetics in order to maximize patient comfort and avoid postoperative nausea and vomiting.…”
Section: Day Of Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the mastectomy skin flap was thin or viability judged to be suboptimal clinically, a tissue expander was placed in the subpectoral plane. Tumor size or oncologic characteristics did not influence the decision to perform pre-pectoral versus subpectoral reconstruction, the determinant of implant placement location and single versus staged approach is determined by mastectomy skin flap viability, which is supported by the literature [16,17]. Anesthetic was administered using a strict total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) protocol along with administration of at least two anti-emetics in order to maximize patient comfort and avoid postoperative nausea and vomiting.…”
Section: Day Of Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of skin flaps in the present study was performed by means of visual inspection and evaluation of perfusion based on clinical judgement (warmth, colour, capillary refill). Although we did not use peri-operative assessment of vascular flow to the mastectomy flaps, the use of such techniques in case of concern may provide useful information to guide the surgical plan (18). The implant loss rate in the present study was 4.5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“… 54 By facilitating an optimal breast pocket, ADMs help to obtain symmetrical coverage, enhance the aesthetic outcome, decrease pain from pectoralis muscle mobilisation and reduce scarring. 57 , 62 Limited capsule contracture and scarring may also be attributed to the decreased inflammatory response associated with ADMs. 63 , 64 Additionally, it is more difficult for scar tissue or capsules to develop on the ADM surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%