1994
DOI: 10.1109/43.329271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing pipelined networks of associative and commutative operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the reductions are consistent. In summary, the comparisons of the results strongly suggest that considering layout effects 6 'optimal' when considering gate delays only. 7 The target layout we used is gate array (lattice) style for simplicity, but our approach can be applied to any layout style such as standard cell and FPGA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, the reductions are consistent. In summary, the comparisons of the results strongly suggest that considering layout effects 6 'optimal' when considering gate delays only. 7 The target layout we used is gate array (lattice) style for simplicity, but our approach can be applied to any layout style such as standard cell and FPGA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Algebraic optimization techniques have been employed for improving resource utilization [ 1 I], tree height minimization [4,5], maximization of data throughput [7][6] and minimization of power consumption [2] (see [ 111 for a comprehensive overview). Although all published approaches are very powerful in their own domain, most of them have certain restrictions concerning the set of supported transformation rules (commutativity, associativity, distributivity, and some special domain-specific rules are usually exploited) and the objective function to be optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, MCM techniques have evolved as the most efficient ones in realizing filter coefficients. Therefore, many efforts have been made to reduce the number of SA and MB adders within the MCM context [23][24][25][26][27][28]30,33,37,38,41,[43][44][45]54,[56][57][58][70][71][72]. Although most MCM algorithms are considered in transposed direct form, it should be noted that the direct form may synthesize the filter in the same complexity.…”
Section: Early Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the extrapolation of the center coefficient being added twice in the implementation where coefficient symmetry is exploited, a modified structure, illustrated by a 10-th order example, is shown in Table 3.3: Impulse Response of Example 2. Coefficients from ℎ (13) to ℎ (25) are chosen as the prototype lobe. Residuals from ℎ (0) to ℎ (12) and coefficients from ℎ (13) to ℎ (31) are realized in the multiplier block.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%