2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccw.2015.7247157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing placements of backhaul hubs and orientations of antennas in small cell networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Current backhauling/fronthauling solutions are based on delivering the traffic of small cells to an aggregation point arXiv:1607.01472v3 [cs.NI] 4 May 2017 (central hub). The optimal hub placement problem has been shown to be NP-complete; as a matter of fact, the LoS hub placement may turn out to be simply infeasible since with ultra-dense small cell deployment, particularly in ultradense urban areas, some small cells are deployed in hard to reach areas in which LOS propagation is impossible [3]. In such scenarios, RF non-LOS point-to-multipoint (NLOS PtM) solutions which rely on licensed sub-6 GHz spectrum or microwave frequencies could be used at the expense of severe interference, congestion and higher cost [2].…”
Section: A Overview Of Backhauling/fronthaulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current backhauling/fronthauling solutions are based on delivering the traffic of small cells to an aggregation point arXiv:1607.01472v3 [cs.NI] 4 May 2017 (central hub). The optimal hub placement problem has been shown to be NP-complete; as a matter of fact, the LoS hub placement may turn out to be simply infeasible since with ultra-dense small cell deployment, particularly in ultradense urban areas, some small cells are deployed in hard to reach areas in which LOS propagation is impossible [3]. In such scenarios, RF non-LOS point-to-multipoint (NLOS PtM) solutions which rely on licensed sub-6 GHz spectrum or microwave frequencies could be used at the expense of severe interference, congestion and higher cost [2].…”
Section: A Overview Of Backhauling/fronthaulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connectivity between SBSs or aggregation points and the NFPs is also based on PtP FSO beams. Each SBS with a clear LOS link with a NFP delivers/receives its uplink/downlink traffic to/from the intended NFP via FSO link 3 . On the other hand, SBSs with no LOS with a NFP can be served by a nearby SBS which has a clear LOS with a NFP.…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Var I (b) qn = p 2 c Var Q q ′ =q μ2 q ′ lq ′ (x qn , y qn ) ḡH q ′ ,qn Ḡq ′ a q ′ 2 (a) = Q q ′ =q p c μ2 q ′ lq ′ (x qn , y qn ) 2 Var a H q ′ ḠH q ′ ḡq ′ ,qn ḡH q ′ ,qn Ḡq ′ a q ′ = Q q ′ =q p c μ2 q ′ lq ′ (x qn , y qn ) Ḡq,qn ′ b qn lq (x qn ′ , y qn ′ ) 2 = p c μ2 q lq (x qn , y qn )E b H qn ḠH q,qn Υ q a q 2 = p c μ2 q lq (x qn , y qn )E a H q Υ H q Ḡq,qn b qn b H qn ḠH q,qn Υ q a q (a)…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…It also establishes difficulties in designing the network because the communication on the fronthaul (CU-to-RRH) and on the access (RRH-to-user) channels are dependent. In turn, the fronthaul scheme and the deployed locations of the RRHs affect network performance, thus both must be chosen carefully [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies consider placement of relay nodes inside cells to improve signal quality at cell edges [14], [15], yet the capacity boost obtained through simple radio frequency (RF) amplification and relaying is limited. Other studies consider addition of small-cell base stations inside a macrocell, each receiving wireless backhaul directly from the wired macro-BS, forming a backhaul network with star topology [4], [16], [17]. In [18], a multihop network is considered in the form of a row of nodes inside one street along with one wired node that acts as a gateway.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%