2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing public transport transfers by integrating timetable coordination and vehicle scheduling

Tao Liu,
Wen Ji,
Konstantinos Gkiotsalitis
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognizing the limitations of static timetables, Ai et al [16] introduced a dynamic optimization method for bus schedules using deep reinforcement learning, employing a deep Q network to produce more cost-effective and higher-quality timetables. Addressing the synchronization of bus timetables and schedules, Liu et al [17] formulated integer linear programming models, applying the ε-constraint method and solvers for small-scale issues, and devised a strategy to streamline constraints for larger problems. Dou et al [18] designed a mathematical model to reduce passenger wait times, transfer, and operational costs, solved via an artificial bee colony algorithm to mitigate the feeder bus scheduling challenges.…”
Section: In the Optimization Of Feeder Bus Timetable Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recognizing the limitations of static timetables, Ai et al [16] introduced a dynamic optimization method for bus schedules using deep reinforcement learning, employing a deep Q network to produce more cost-effective and higher-quality timetables. Addressing the synchronization of bus timetables and schedules, Liu et al [17] formulated integer linear programming models, applying the ε-constraint method and solvers for small-scale issues, and devised a strategy to streamline constraints for larger problems. Dou et al [18] designed a mathematical model to reduce passenger wait times, transfer, and operational costs, solved via an artificial bee colony algorithm to mitigate the feeder bus scheduling challenges.…”
Section: In the Optimization Of Feeder Bus Timetable Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (10) indicates that when the feeder bus route m is included in the feeder bus network, passengers are able to choose the route m; Constraint (11) signifies that when feeder bus route m passes through a station, passengers can select route m to reach station s; Constraint (12) is the integrity constraint for feeder bus routes, indicating that each feeder bus route should include at least one rail transit station and bus station; Constraint (13) represents the requirement for the departure interval of feeder bus route m to meet actual conditions; Constraint (14) expresses the total number of buses required on the feeder bus route; Constraint (15) denotes the constraint on the capacity utilization rate of feeder buses; Constraint (16) specifies that the length of feeder bus routes should meet actual route limitations; Constraint (17) states the number of serviced bus stations required on feeder bus routes; Constraint (18) demonstrates that the service time for each bus trip on feeder bus route m should fall within a certain service level range; Constraint (19) indicates that the departure time for route m at station s should occur after route m passes through station s, where κ is a large positive number; Constraints (20)-( 22) refer to 0-1 integer decision variables.…”
Section: 4 Multi-objective Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%