2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.04747
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing quantum-enhanced Bayesian multiparameter estimation in noisy apparata

Abstract: Achieving quantum-enhanced performances when measuring unknown quantities requires developing suitable methodologies for practical scenarios, that include noise and the availability of a limited amount of resources. Here, we report on the optimization of quantum-enhanced Bayesian multiparameter estimation in a scenario where a subset of the parameters describes unavoidable noise processes in an experimental photonic sensor. We explore how the optimization of the estimation changes depending on which parameters… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the mean is greater than the median, and the proportionality factor among them can be estimated numerically computing the ratio of the median of a generic squared Gaussian distribution centered in zero and its mean. This factor, in the single-parameter case, results equal to k ≃ 0.4549 [25] and it must be taken into consideration when comparing the performances in terms of medians with the ultimate precision bound. Moreover, we underline that when comparing the overall estimation performances to the precision bound, after having considered either the mean or the median over the different repetitions of the estimate (that we indicate respectively with M[•] and M[•]), it is necessary to consider the average performances among all the different parameter values.…”
Section: Single Parameter Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, the mean is greater than the median, and the proportionality factor among them can be estimated numerically computing the ratio of the median of a generic squared Gaussian distribution centered in zero and its mean. This factor, in the single-parameter case, results equal to k ≃ 0.4549 [25] and it must be taken into consideration when comparing the performances in terms of medians with the ultimate precision bound. Moreover, we underline that when comparing the overall estimation performances to the precision bound, after having considered either the mean or the median over the different repetitions of the estimate (that we indicate respectively with M[•] and M[•]), it is necessary to consider the average performances among all the different parameter values.…”
Section: Single Parameter Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously discussed, our approach to computing the necessary integrals for Bayesian estimation involved discretizing the parameter space into n possible values covering the entire periodicity interval. This discretization was conducted in accordance with SMC, also known as the particle filtering method [44], used in recent multiparameter estimation experiments [24][25][26]. The objective was to reconstruct the posterior probability distribution of the parameter and then use it to estimate its value.…”
Section: Single Parameter Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations