2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-016-2375-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing satisfaction in a multi-courses allocation problem combined with a timetabling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ACO meta‐heuristic is based on the foraging behaviour of ants, which deposit pheromones on the paths they use (Dorigo et al, 2006; Nogareda and Camacho, 2016; Stützle and Hoos, 2000). In ACO, virtual ants deposit pheromones on the solution they find.…”
Section: Aco and Ga Approaches For The Rvrpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ACO meta‐heuristic is based on the foraging behaviour of ants, which deposit pheromones on the paths they use (Dorigo et al, 2006; Nogareda and Camacho, 2016; Stützle and Hoos, 2000). In ACO, virtual ants deposit pheromones on the solution they find.…”
Section: Aco and Ga Approaches For The Rvrpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when seats are allocated to students in a university, students may submit preferences for the courses, in which case, the simple objective might be to maximize students' satisfaction [8]. If professors have also preferences for students, because of their background or their grades, then both types of preferences, students' and professors', have to be considered in order to find a good solution to the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If any of those constraints is not fully satisfied in a solution, then this solution will not be feasible. We can find for example capacity constraints [5,7,8], or skills constraints [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation