2012
DOI: 10.1177/0017896912437298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing school-based health-promotion programmes: Lessons from a qualitative study of fluoridated milk schemes in the UK

Abstract: Background and objective: Some districts in the United Kingdom (UK), where the level of child dental caries is high and water fluoridation has not been possible, implement school-based fluoridated milk (FM) schemes. However, process variables, such as consent to drink FM and loss of children as they mature, impede the effectiveness of these schemes. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of lay participants in FM schemes on the barriers and potential solutions to optimizing schemes and understand h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reason for this limited reach may be that the mixed dissemination approach was dominated by passive strategies. Active strategies, for instance those involving enthusiastic users of the programme (Ballew et al, 2010;Buller et al, 2007), as well as the use of additional channels, (Rohrbach et al, 2005) such as websites, conference presentations and networking activities, might further increase the decision makers' awareness level (Foster and Tickle, 2012). A second reason may be the widely acknowledged fact that schools tend to get flooded with information on all kinds of programmes (Butler et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reason for this limited reach may be that the mixed dissemination approach was dominated by passive strategies. Active strategies, for instance those involving enthusiastic users of the programme (Ballew et al, 2010;Buller et al, 2007), as well as the use of additional channels, (Rohrbach et al, 2005) such as websites, conference presentations and networking activities, might further increase the decision makers' awareness level (Foster and Tickle, 2012). A second reason may be the widely acknowledged fact that schools tend to get flooded with information on all kinds of programmes (Butler et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%