2023
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Screening for Early Disease Detection in Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FLORIS): A Prospective Cohort Study Design

Abstract: Background: Familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) can be defined as pulmonary fibrosis in two or more first-degree family members. The first-degree family members of FPF patients are at high risk of developing FPF and are eligible for screening. Reproducible studies investigating risk factors for disease are much needed. Methods: Description of the screening study protocol for a single-center, prospective cohort study; the study will include 200 asymptomatic, first-degree family members of patients with FPF who wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two siblings also presented with the STS phenotypes IPF and bone marrow failure. Four paternal cousins had IPF, whereas HRCT of one female cousin, aged 68 years, displayed signs of emphysema and familial interstitial lung abnormalities (FILA) [ 17 ]. Furthermore, two paternal cousins died of acute myeloid leukaemia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two siblings also presented with the STS phenotypes IPF and bone marrow failure. Four paternal cousins had IPF, whereas HRCT of one female cousin, aged 68 years, displayed signs of emphysema and familial interstitial lung abnormalities (FILA) [ 17 ]. Furthermore, two paternal cousins died of acute myeloid leukaemia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have noted the presence of interstitial abnormalities on HRCT in asymptomatic relatives of pulmonary fibrosis patients, but the use of repeat HRCT as a screening mechanism in these individuals is probably not advisable based on radiation exposure and cost unless they are experiencing symptoms [ 37 , 38 ]. However, data regarding the use of alternate screening methods such as clinical evaluation and pulmonary function testing to reliably detect disease are limited and research is ongoing [ 39 ].…”
Section: Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%