2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing spatial patterns with sparse filter bands for motor-imagery based brain–computer interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
149
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons are as follows: on the one hand, as the feature extraction method, CSP does not take the frequency domain information into account, which will generate unrepresentative ECoG features, and affect classification accuracy later [7]; on the other hand, we apply ELM in feature classification. Due to its random assignment of input weights, it is difficult to get global optimum in the process of finding the optimal weight [8].…”
Section: Results On Extreme Learning Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons are as follows: on the one hand, as the feature extraction method, CSP does not take the frequency domain information into account, which will generate unrepresentative ECoG features, and affect classification accuracy later [7]; on the other hand, we apply ELM in feature classification. Due to its random assignment of input weights, it is difficult to get global optimum in the process of finding the optimal weight [8].…”
Section: Results On Extreme Learning Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The straight lines parallel to horizontal axis show the mean values corresponding to each trial. Channels are regarded as "good" if they are visibly discriminable on average between two classes [7]. We transfer the features extracted by CSP to SVM, ELM and OELM, results are listed below.…”
Section: Preprocessing Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of these potentials, SMR-based BCI provides a high degree of freedom in association with real and imaginary movements of hands, arms, feet and tongue [8]. The neural activities associated with SMRbased motor imagery (MI) BCI are the so-called mu (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) and beta (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) Hz) rhythms [9]. These rhythms are readily measurable in both healthy and disabled people with neuromuscular injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few research on feature optimization for MI-based BCI [23] and Steady-State VEP (SSVEP)-based BCI [24] has been carried out recently. In this work, to provide subject-specific optimal features, two different feature selection methodologies, such as minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevancy (mRMR) method and Lasso regularization-based feature selection method are studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG based BCI systems is preferred for other BCI system because of practical use, low cost, good response, portability [3]. There are some most common approaches to EEG based BCI systems that are P300 potentials, event-related (de)synchronization (ERD/ERS), slow cortical potentials, oscillatory activity, and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) [4][5][6][7]. The Steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) is a brain response modulated by the frequency of repetitive visual stimulus [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%