2006
DOI: 10.1002/lt.20847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing staging for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: A retrospective analysis of the UNOS/OPTN database

Abstract: Assignment of liver allocation priority for hepatocellular carcinoma is predicated on accurate imaging staging. We analyzed radiographically defined stage (radiologic stage [RS]) at listing and most recent extension and pathologic stage (PS) data from 789 liver transplant recipients for whom no pretransplant ablative treatment was given. There were no predetermined imaging or pathological protocols in this retrospective analysis of wait list data. Seventy-two (9.1%), 690 (87.5%), and 27 (3.4%) were listed as s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
117
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
117
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, cadaveric liver grafts are assigned with priority only to patients meeting the MC at the time of pretransplant staging 107 (ie, United Network for Organ Sharing category T2).…”
Section: And Transplantation For Patients With Hcc Beyond Conventimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, cadaveric liver grafts are assigned with priority only to patients meeting the MC at the time of pretransplant staging 107 (ie, United Network for Organ Sharing category T2).…”
Section: And Transplantation For Patients With Hcc Beyond Conventimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, several studies have pointed out which concepts or approaches should be abandoned or at least largely improved. The manuscripts by Kemmer et al 7 and by Freeman et al 8 published in this issue of Liver Transplantation are important additions in that regard.…”
Section: See Articles On Pages 1504 and 1519mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The majority of such guidelines endorse ultrasound (US) for screening and surveillance. Contrastenhanced CT or contrast-enhanced MRI are recommended to more definitively evaluate US-detected lesions, detect HCC missed by US in at-risk patients [1][2][3], establish the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC [1][2][3][4], stage tumor extent [4,10,11], assess the severity of underlying liver disease and portal hypertension [12], inform treatment decisions for HCC [11], assess therapeutic response [9,10,13,14] and determine eligibility and priority for liver transplantation [9,13,[15][16][17][18]. In addition, in many North American centers, CT and MRI are used for screening and surveillance and not just for evaluation of patients with positive findings at US surveillance.…”
Section: Role Of Ct and Mri In Diagnosis And Management Of Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaging criteria in most of these guidelines focus only on HCC and hence, in effect, categorize lesions in cirrhotic livers in a binary fashion as either diagnostic of HCC or not diagnostic of HCC [5,9,10,15]. The criteria do not comprehensively address the full spectrum of lesions and pseudolesions, from benign to malignant, encountered in the cirrhotic liver at CT and MRI.…”
Section: Limitations Of Current Imaging Guidelines For Hcc Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%