2015
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2014.2346929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Template for Lookup-Table Inverse Halftoning using Elitist Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method based on look-up table was first proposed by Mese et al [13] for inverse halftoning. Since then, many methods were proposed to improve the performance of this method [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In summary, the improvements include three aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method based on look-up table was first proposed by Mese et al [13] for inverse halftoning. Since then, many methods were proposed to improve the performance of this method [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In summary, the improvements include three aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the improvements include three aspects. The first is the template selection and optimization [14,15], where the correlation method and the elitist genetic algorithm were used to obtain the best template. The second is to reduce the size of the table and improve the speed of searching look-up table [16][17][18][19], while the third is to get the accurate contone value from each template pattern [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA have allowed to obtain optimal solutions to engineer problems related with the processing of images, prediction of time series, processing of voice, language, audio, and location model [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. GA have mutation characteristics, crossing, and selection taken from nature, allowing to maximize the search of information in n-dimensional spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the best individual with highest fitness is selected as the final output. Numerical experiments demonstrate that GEP has a significantly better performance compared to genetic algorithm (GA) 27,30 and genetic programming (GP) 1,17 , and surpasses those conventional methods by more than two orders of magnitude 10,11,12 . However, GEP has also been shown to have certain disadvantages, such as slow convergence and low solution accuracy, particularly for problems with a high-dimensional and large space 4,6,24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%