2020 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icitiit49094.2020.9071523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the Computational Offloading Decision in Cloud-Fog Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [ 50 , 51 , 52 ] introduced a two-tier IoT model using the iFogSim simulator and analyzed the network parameters (including latency, power consumption, network usage, cost). Furthermore, in one of our previous works [ 47 ], we exploited the benefit of local tier processing, proposed a three-tier IoT edge model, and analyzed the performance of the network.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Cloud Iot Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [ 50 , 51 , 52 ] introduced a two-tier IoT model using the iFogSim simulator and analyzed the network parameters (including latency, power consumption, network usage, cost). Furthermore, in one of our previous works [ 47 ], we exploited the benefit of local tier processing, proposed a three-tier IoT edge model, and analyzed the performance of the network.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Cloud Iot Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cloud-only, processing services are transmitted to the cloud data center and in edge-ward services push towards fog devices when enough resources are available. Some research works for solving SPP employ optimization techniques [26,27], such as greedy, heuristics, ILP, and genetic algorithms. In Reference [21], the authors consider SPP for IoT applications over fog resources as an optimization problem and proposed a problem resolution heuristic using the genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the limitations of existing works are: (i) following the traditional hierarchical structure of fog-cloud, not making optimal use of the computing resources available in the fog layer and executing more services on cloud data centers, which increases the user response time [5,23,24,26,44], (ii) using hypothetical data instead of experimental data and, thus, uncertainty about the feasibility of implementing the algorithm in the real world [5,14,24,26,27,34,40,41,43,45], (iii) modeling the problem as an ILP and the complexity of problem solving when increasing the number of services and fog nodes on a large scale [21,22,32,44], (iv) ignoring priority for the applications and demands of services [5,14,18,[21][22][23][25][26][27]34,35,40,43], (v) ignoring mobility of fog nodes [3,14,18,[21][22][23]25,26,35,41,43,45], and (vi) improving only two or three QoS metrics…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors [73,74,75,76] have already proposed algorithms based on the mathematical analysis of two-layer middleware architectures (cloud and fog) for Smart Cities. Articles that are not focused on Smart Cities, such as Mahmoud et al [77] for health-care, were not considered here, although many had good proposals for algorithms and quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Multi-tier System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%