1994
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990170412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the detection of cell surface antigens on elicited or activated mouse peritoneal macrophages

Abstract: Blocking conditions that are optimal for the detection of surface antigens on resident peritoneal macrophages (PM+) by flow cytometry are not ideal for elicited or activated PM+. A blocking step of 10% goat serum can be used routinely to detect the F4/80 and Mac-1 antigens on resident PM+. In contrast, high concentrations (3350% each) of combined goat and mouse sera were required to reduce nonspecific binding and to improve the detection of the F4/80 antigen on PM+ elicited by thioglycollate broth (TG) or acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spinal cords were dissected from the vertebral canal. Mononuclear cells were isolated and prepared as previously described (Hendrzak et al, 1994; Pope et al, 1996). Data collection was performed on a LSR II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) flow cytometer using FACS Diva software (Becton Dickinson) and analysis was performed offline using FCS Express software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal cords were dissected from the vertebral canal. Mononuclear cells were isolated and prepared as previously described (Hendrzak et al, 1994; Pope et al, 1996). Data collection was performed on a LSR II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) flow cytometer using FACS Diva software (Becton Dickinson) and analysis was performed offline using FCS Express software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal cords were dissected from the vertebral canal or removed by intrathecal hydrostatic pressure. Mononuclear cells were isolated and prepared as described previously [34,35]. Data collection was performed on a LSR II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) flow cytometer in the Interdepartmental Immunobiology Center Flow Cytometry Facility (Northwestern University) using FACSDiva software (Becton Dickinson), and analysis was performed offline using FCS Express (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA).…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since macrophage represent a special population of cells varying their shape, size and vacuolization throughout an inflammatory event (Hendrzak et al 1994) we established parameters (Silva et al 1997) to investigate PM using anti-CD16/32, anti-CD11b MoAb and Percoll discontinuous gradient. The differences among cell size, granularity and CD11b expression were better observed at 51 and 57% Percoll densities (Fig.…”
Section: Flow Cytometry Of Pulmonary Macrophage Subpopulations and Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive staining was verified under fluorescence microscope (Nikkon ® ). Flow cytometry of macrophages was performed as described previously (Hendrzak et al 1994) using cell suspensions of 1 × 10 6 of BAL or PEM incubated at 4 • C for 30 min with 1 g of rat monoclonal anti CD11b (CD11b/CD18, BD-Pharmingen) anti CD23 (Mac-2, Boehringer, Mannheim) or anti Mac-3 antibodies (Accurate Chemical) anti-Ia d (BD-Pharmingen) diluted 1:100 in FACS-PBS containing 5% BSA, 8% FCS, 1% mouse control, 2.5% of normal goat or rat serum and 0.02% sodium azide. To develop the reaction, 10 l of anti-rat IgG, raised in goat and labelled with FITC (Dako) and diluted 1:2000 in the FACS-PBS was added and incubated at 4 • C for 30 min.…”
Section: Cellular Staining With Pkh26gl and Flow Cytometry Of Mononucmentioning
confidence: 99%