2013
DOI: 10.1364/ao.52.006877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the diffraction efficiency of SLM-based holography with respect to the fringing field effect

Abstract: The fringing field effect of liquid-crystal displays causes a crosstalk between neighboring pixels, so that a desired sharp phase edge gets blurred. This blurring effect influences the diffraction efficiency of holograms, which are displayed on the spatial light modulator (SLM). In this paper, we show two different simulation models for the SLM, one based on the measured subpixel Jones matrices of the SLM and the other based on a direction-dependent convolution model. Using these models we optimize different b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably the different exchange of energy between replicas when changing the image being addressed onto the LCoS is due to the pixel crosstalk caused by the fringing fields, i.e., the gradual voltage changes across the border of neighboring pixels and by elastic forces in the liquid-crystal material preventing abrupt spatial variations in the phase modulation [30][31][32][33]. Both effects cause the realized phase modulation of a pixel to depend also on the voltage applied over adjacent pixels.…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Realization: Blazed Gratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably the different exchange of energy between replicas when changing the image being addressed onto the LCoS is due to the pixel crosstalk caused by the fringing fields, i.e., the gradual voltage changes across the border of neighboring pixels and by elastic forces in the liquid-crystal material preventing abrupt spatial variations in the phase modulation [30][31][32][33]. Both effects cause the realized phase modulation of a pixel to depend also on the voltage applied over adjacent pixels.…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Realization: Blazed Gratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we explained in [21] , probably the different exchange of energy between replicas when changing the image being addressed onto the LCoS is due to the pixel crosstalk caused by the fringing fields, i.e. the gradual voltage changes across the border of neighboring pixels, and by elastic forces in the LC material preventing abrupt spatial variations in the phase modulation [27] [28] . Both effects cause the realized phase modulation of a pixel to depend also on the voltage applied over adjacent pixels.…”
Section: Blazed Gratings: Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The near field optimization method provides a more direct and accurate measurement. Similar near field approaches [61] are also proposed by measuring the sub-pixel Jones matrices and modeling the fringing field effect as a low pass filter. In order to compensate for the diffraction efficiency reduction of the blazed grating due to the fringing field effect, a voltage profile optimization method has been verified using rigorous numerical simulation software for liquid crystal devices by X. Wang et al [62,63].…”
Section: Fringing Field Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%