2003
DOI: 10.1080/02786820300920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Thermal-Optical Methods for Measuring Atmospheric Elemental (Black) Carbon: A Response Surface Study

Abstract: The chemical, physical, and morphological complexity of atmospheric aerosol elemental carbon (EC) presents major problems in assuring measurement accuracy. Since EC and black carbon are often considered equivalent, methods based on thermal-optical analysis (TOA) are widely used for EC in ambient air samples because no prior knowledge of the aerosol's absorption coefficient is required. • C for 60 s, 850• C for 60 s, and 900• C for 90 s to 120 s, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4, during the CN week, the variations in BC was similar to those of EC, and the average BC/EC ratio was 0.92±0.14, which is very close to 1. This result conforms to the general viewpoint that EC is a major contributor to ambient aerosol light absorption and explains why EC is often used interchangeably with BC when the aerosol effect on climate is considered, when an aethalometer needs calibrating, or when BC emission inventories are developed (Conny et al 2003;Vignati et al 2010;Petzold et al 1997). However, the trends shifted abruptly during the HH week, with the BC levels consistently higher than the corresponding EC levels.…”
Section: Variation Of Ec and Bc Concentrations For Cn And Hh Periodssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, during the CN week, the variations in BC was similar to those of EC, and the average BC/EC ratio was 0.92±0.14, which is very close to 1. This result conforms to the general viewpoint that EC is a major contributor to ambient aerosol light absorption and explains why EC is often used interchangeably with BC when the aerosol effect on climate is considered, when an aethalometer needs calibrating, or when BC emission inventories are developed (Conny et al 2003;Vignati et al 2010;Petzold et al 1997). However, the trends shifted abruptly during the HH week, with the BC levels consistently higher than the corresponding EC levels.…”
Section: Variation Of Ec and Bc Concentrations For Cn And Hh Periodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…BC cannot be measured directly but must be inferred from the particle light absorption (b ap ) through a conversion factor that is used to translate b ap to the BC mass concentration (Chow et al 2009;Biswas et al 2003). According to the literature, both EC and BC are considered to assume a graphitic structure and are therefore thermally refractory and light-absorbing in nature (Bond and Bergstrom 2006;Salako et al 2012;Conny et al 2003;Turpin et al 1990). It seems that both EC and BC describe nearly the same fraction of carbonaceous aerosols; however, according to traditional practice, their values are dependent on specified determination methods which focus on different properties, e.g., thermal stability or light absorption (Birch 1998;Chow et al 1993;Hansen et al 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is anticipated that as sites were changed from the CSN OC/ EC approach to the IMPROVE approach a step change is likely to be observed, potentially with slightly lower OC and higher EC; total carbon will likely change little Schmid et al, 2001;Conny et al, 2003;Watson et al, 2005;Cheng et al, 2011). This change also resulted in better precision and lower MDL values for OC, EC, and OC fractions as seen in Table 11 when comparing 2006 to 2012.…”
Section: Csn and Improve Program Historiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Beginning with samples collected in January 2005, IMPROVE provides both TOR and TOT results (DRI, 2005;Chow et al, 2007). Several studies have been conducted comparing the IMPROVE, CSN, and in some cases other protocols for OC and EC Schmid et al, 2001;Conny et al, 2003;Chow et al, 2004;Watson et al, 2005;Cheng et al, 2011).…”
Section: Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of the thermal or thermal-optical techniques to the light-absorbing substances in biomass smoke has not been adequately characterized, but seems to be very dependent on the instrumental settings (Conny et al, 2003). Birch and Cary (1996) note that with an "optimized" setting they find only 0.86% EC a in cigarette smoke, while with a "less than optimal" setting 20-30% of the carbon in cigarette smoke was designated elemental.…”
Section: Thermochemical Analysis ("Ec")mentioning
confidence: 99%