T&DI Congress 2014 2014
DOI: 10.1061/9780784413586.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Ultrasonic Rail Defect Inspection to Improve Transportation Safety and Efficiency

Abstract: Preventing broken-rail-caused derailments is a high priority for the rail industry and government. The current practice is to periodically inspect rails using non-destructive technologies such as ultrasonic rail inspection. Determining the optimal inspection frequency is a critical decision in railway infrastructure management. The objective of this paper is to develop an analytical framework to address the trade-offs among various factors related to rail defect inspection frequency, in order to maximize rail … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual examination of the weld for visible defects by the welding personnel such as geometry is first test. Ultrasonic, Hardness, Slow Bends Test, Fracture Surface Examination, and Micro-and Macro Structure Examination are other tests for weld quality (Liu et al 2014). Ultrasonic Testing (UT) uses high frequency sound waves (typically 0.5 and 15 MHz) to conduct examinations and make measurements.…”
Section: Rail Weldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual examination of the weld for visible defects by the welding personnel such as geometry is first test. Ultrasonic, Hardness, Slow Bends Test, Fracture Surface Examination, and Micro-and Macro Structure Examination are other tests for weld quality (Liu et al 2014). Ultrasonic Testing (UT) uses high frequency sound waves (typically 0.5 and 15 MHz) to conduct examinations and make measurements.…”
Section: Rail Weldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a model developed by AAR, the long-term cost of Rail-welds is given by Eq. (5) (Liu et al 2014).…”
Section: Optimal Inspection Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study suggests it could cost on average $300 per hour per vehicle. 8 Although FRA launched its own Automated Track Inspection Program (ATIP) for more than 30 years that is fully automated and can provide a full-scale rail geometry inspection, ATIP geometry vehicles are often cost-prohibitive 9,10 to short-lines (Class II and Class III railroads) that covers almost 1/3 of the entire U.S. rail network. The operations of these railroads are often constrained by their insufficient revenue 11 and lack of qualified employees, 12 as they are still heavily relying on the traditional, labor-intensive windshield or manual track inspections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study suggests it could cost on average $300 per hour per vehicle. 8 Although FRA launched its own Automated Track Inspection Program (ATIP) for more than 30 years that is fully automated and can provide a full-scale rail geometry inspection, ATIP geometry vehicles are often costprohibitive 9,10 to short-lines (Class II and Class III railroads) that covers almost 1/3 of the entire U.S. rail network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the nature of the manual inspection, the results of inspecting missing components could be very low‐efficient and expensive. Based on Liu, Dick, and Saat (2014), except for the labor cost, the speed of inspection is around 15 to 20 mph and the average inspection cost per hour per vehicle is almost 300 dollars. Even with the manned‐inspection vehicles, the expected annual inspection cost is easily millions of dollars, let alone that a considerable amount of the missing track components is manually inspected by walking crew.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%