SAE Technical Paper Series 2006
DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-0961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Vehicle Occupant Packaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, physics-based posture prediction method results in a mean value ranging from À0.024 N to 0.588 N. The shear forces obtained with physics-based posture prediction method are comparable with shear forces obtained in Bush and Hubbard (2007) and Olesen (2012). Also, usage of multi-objective optimization that considers accommodation in terms of vision and seat location simultaneously, reduces the adjustment range in horizontal direction presented in (Parkinson and Reed, 2006) by 76 mm with a relative error of 4.5% in averaged downvision angle proving the proposed formulation gives accurate results for vision as well. The difference between the predicted seat track locations is 36 mm and 23 mm in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively, from that in (SAE International, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, physics-based posture prediction method results in a mean value ranging from À0.024 N to 0.588 N. The shear forces obtained with physics-based posture prediction method are comparable with shear forces obtained in Bush and Hubbard (2007) and Olesen (2012). Also, usage of multi-objective optimization that considers accommodation in terms of vision and seat location simultaneously, reduces the adjustment range in horizontal direction presented in (Parkinson and Reed, 2006) by 76 mm with a relative error of 4.5% in averaged downvision angle proving the proposed formulation gives accurate results for vision as well. The difference between the predicted seat track locations is 36 mm and 23 mm in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively, from that in (SAE International, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The difference between the predicted seat track locations is 36 mm and 23 mm in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively, from that in (SAE International, 2005). The predicted vertical adjustment range has only 3 mm difference with (Parkinson and Reed, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main drawbacks of this technique are: (1) inaccurate estimations of anthropometry at the tails of the distribution and (2) the necessity of a detailed database from which to obtain the regression equations. The accuracy of the regression methodology, particularly in the tails of the distribution, is increased considerably with the inclusion of residual variance as a stochastic component in the model (Parkinson and Reed, 2006;Garneau and Parkinson, 2009).…”
Section: Simulating Virtual Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, he/she has to determine the position of the markers on the manikin using a coordinate-measuring machine (CMM) to determine the joint angles of the manikin. A method of optimizing the parameters of vehicle occupant packaging using a posturing model from various populations under some vehicle constraints has been proposed [6] .…”
Section: Parametric Design Of Vehicle Interiormentioning
confidence: 99%