2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management

Abstract: IntroductionThe development of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) results in disabling breathlessness, pain and reduced physical capability with treatment a palliative strategy. Ambulatory management of MPE has the potential to improve quality of life (QoL). The OPTIMUM trial is designed to determine whether full outpatient management of MPE with an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) and pleurodesis improves QoL compared with traditional inpatient care with a chest drain and talc pleurodesis. OPTIMUM is currently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPIToME approach circumvents our inability to accurately predict/define NEL, and decreases unnecessary pleural interventions. The OPTIMUM (Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management) study is a multicentre RCT employing a similar (IPC followed by talc slurry via the catheter) protocol and comparing this with conventional bedside talc pleurodesis with small‐bore chest tubes in improving the quality‐of‐life of MPE patients. These studies will have impact on future research priorities in NEL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPIToME approach circumvents our inability to accurately predict/define NEL, and decreases unnecessary pleural interventions. The OPTIMUM (Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management) study is a multicentre RCT employing a similar (IPC followed by talc slurry via the catheter) protocol and comparing this with conventional bedside talc pleurodesis with small‐bore chest tubes in improving the quality‐of‐life of MPE patients. These studies will have impact on future research priorities in NEL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We await the results OPTIMUM and IPC-PLUS trials, which evaluated outpatient IPC with TS pleurodesis versus TS pleurodesis only. 117,118 In addition, the role of IPC in nonmalignant effusion has yet to be clearly delineated and more data are awaited from the REDUCE trial (ISRCTN66354436). • Further improving our ability to predict successful pleurodesis.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Darüber hinaus scheint die Pleurodese-Rate (43%) niedriger als bei der Pleurodese via Thoraxdrainage, die etwa 70% beträgt. Ein Vergleich einer Pleurodese via IPC gegenüber einer Thoraxdrainage ist aktuell Gegenstand einer klinischen Studie [3]. Die symptomatische Besserung, die durch einen IPC (ohne Pleurodese) erreicht werden kann, scheint hingegen vergleichbar mit einer Pleurodese via Thoraxdrainge [2,4].…”
Section: Transfer In Die Praxis Von Dr Stefanie Keymel (Düsseldorf)unclassified