Optimum calibration of a corrosion rate instrument using information gain criterion within a Bayesian framework

Faroz, Sharvil Alex; Ghosh, Siddhartha; Pushkaran, Thushara

doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102354

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is crucial to ensuring the safety and reliability of buildings or structures that utilize reinforced concrete beams as structural elements. The use of GFRP layers has a positive impact on RC beams in terms of increased strength and stiffness and contributes to enhancing ductility [22]. In this study, ductility is described using an index in the form of deflection.…”

Section: Performance Of Beams Ductilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Post-Spalling Reinforced Concrete Beam Repair Using Grouting and GFRP Reinforcement

Mansur,

Djamaluddin,

Parung

et al. 2024

Civ Eng J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reinforced concrete beams must meet strength and durability standards, but aggressive environmental factors are the main cause of corrosion, which can affect the strength and durability of building structures. Maintenance, retrofitting, and reinforcement of structures are important to ensure safety. It is necessary to take appropriate measures to address corrosion problems in building structures early on. One way to achieve this is by repairing damaged structures using more modern and effective technologies and materials. This study aims to determine the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams repaired with Sikagrout-215 material and reinforced with GFRP sheets with different layer configurations. The study used three RC beams as the control group, three RC beams coated with Sikagrout-215 mortar, and six RC beams reinforced with GFRP. All beams were subjected to 4-point bending tests to determine their load capacity, crack response, ductility, and energy absorption capacity. The results showed that repair with grouting decreased the load capacity, while reinforcement with a combination of mortar grouting and GFRP increased the maximum load. Reinforcement of the support region could restore the function of the beam by 9.3%. Among the three types of reinforcement, BGRST significantly improved the first crack response, yield response, and ultimate performance of the RC beams. Beam fracture occurred more frequently with Sikagrout-215 mortar reinforcement, while reinforcement with GFRP composites partially protected the load capacity after fracture. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-08 Full Text: PDF

show abstract

Section: Performance Of Beams Ductilitymentioning

confidence: 99%