1988
DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(88)90072-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum cogeneration strategies for a refrigeration plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mathematical description of an early version of the LP model ELMO, has appeared elsewhere (Musgrove and Maher, 1987). The model uses a concise, but very generalised modular data format for building up a plant description.…”
Section: Elmo Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A mathematical description of an early version of the LP model ELMO, has appeared elsewhere (Musgrove and Maher, 1987). The model uses a concise, but very generalised modular data format for building up a plant description.…”
Section: Elmo Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steam system for an idealized refrigeration plant (Musgrove and Maher, 1987) utilising cogeneration of both electricity and mechanical work along with process steam, is given schematically in Figure 1. The refrigeration load is required for a continuous manufacturing process and varies with the ambient air temperature.…”
Section: Refrigeration Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of the demand cost that is based on the peak electrical demand during a utility billing period (e.g., a month), true optimal supervisory control requires minimization of an integral cost of operation over the entire billing period. Musgrove and Maher (1988) considered optimal control for a cogeneration plant that incorporated electric, steam-driven, and absorption chillers using linear programming. However, they didn't consider demand charges and maintenance costs in their case study, so that the optimization involved minimizing the cost of energy at each point in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%