1988
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.5.574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum cutoff points for biochemical validation of smoking status.

Abstract: Selection of cutoff points for tests to validate smoking cessation should take account of the prevalence of deception. When the prevalence of deception is relatively low, the cutoff points to validate quitting should be relatively high. Many studies have used cutoff points that are too low and may have underestimated cessation rates. We present a method for determining the best cutoff points that takes account of the prevalence of deception. (Am J Public Health 1988; 78:574-575.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During follow-up, biochemical measures were obtained in person only from participants reporting 7-day abstinence. Abstinence was confirmed by a combination of CO ≤ 10 ppm and cotinine ≤ 15 ng/ml (Cummings & Richard, 1988;SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, 2002). In those few cases where biochemical verification could not be obtained (8.2%), self-reported abstinence was verified through interview with a significant other.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During follow-up, biochemical measures were obtained in person only from participants reporting 7-day abstinence. Abstinence was confirmed by a combination of CO ≤ 10 ppm and cotinine ≤ 15 ng/ml (Cummings & Richard, 1988;SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, 2002). In those few cases where biochemical verification could not be obtained (8.2%), self-reported abstinence was verified through interview with a significant other.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 20,050 adult participants, I excluded 4,990 persons who indicated current smoking and an additional 3,639 subjects who did not undergo spirometry, had unreliable spirometry results, or were missing serum cotinine measurements. I excluded another 840 subjects who had serum cotinine levels of ≥ 14 ng/mL, suggesting active current personal smoking (13,14). The present study sample includes 10,581 adult nonsmokers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21). Previous research indicates that serum cotinine levels of ≥ 14 ng/mL are most consistent with personal smoking (13,14), so subjects who indicated no current smoking but had serum cotinine levels greater than this level were reclassified as current smokers and excluded from analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68,69 A cut off of 14 ng/mL or 15 ng/mL in plasma and 50 ng/mL in saliva have been used in differentiating smokers from non-smokers in general population. 65,70 Salivary cotinine, measured by gas chromatography method, showed 99% sensitivity and 100% specificity in determining the smoking status among smokers and nonsmokers. The salivary cotinine confirmed smoking cessation (quitters) in 55% of the past smokers.…”
Section: Yesmentioning
confidence: 99%