2004
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2003.822030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum design of a predistortion RF power amplifier for multicarrier WCDMA applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compensate for IMD, several linearization techniques such as predistortion [1], feedback [2], dynamic biasing [3], and feedforward [4]have been developed. The predistortion approach is complex and has problems with bandwidth depending on the method it uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compensate for IMD, several linearization techniques such as predistortion [1], feedback [2], dynamic biasing [3], and feedforward [4]have been developed. The predistortion approach is complex and has problems with bandwidth depending on the method it uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Ref. 1, there are three main methods to linearize the power amplifiers: feedback [2, 3], predistortion [4, 5], and feedforward [6–9]. The predistortion approach is relatively simple and easy to implement, but its application is limited due to the amount of nonlinear products cancellation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LINEARITY AND MEMORY EFFECTS Linearization techniques can be used to achieve high linearities (carrier to intermodulation (C/I) ratio). Memory effects, however, which can be defined as changes in the amplitude or phase of distortion components (IMD) caused by changes in modulation frequency (∆ω), restrict the linearization techniques for devices exhibiting memory [1] [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%