2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11188762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum Design of Flexural Strength and Stiffness for Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Machine Learning

Abstract: In this paper, an optimization approach was presented for the flexural strength and stiffness design of reinforced concrete beams. Surrogate modeling based on machine learning was applied to predict the responses of the structural system in three-point flexure tests. Three design input variables, the area of steel bars in the compression zone, the area of steel bars in the tension zone, and the area of steel bars in the shear zone, were adopted for the dataset and arranged by the Box-Behnken design method. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) beam behavior was carried out us ing ATENA [39] in conjunction with the GID [40] pre-processor software. This softwar has been previously used in numerous research to simulate the behavior of normal con crete [41][42][43][44][45] and FRCs [7][8][9][10]. As there is currently no standardized method for modeling FRC, an inverse analysis based on the software developers' guidelines [39] was employed to derive the post-cracking tensile stress versus fracture strain relationship for FRCs.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) beam behavior was carried out us ing ATENA [39] in conjunction with the GID [40] pre-processor software. This softwar has been previously used in numerous research to simulate the behavior of normal con crete [41][42][43][44][45] and FRCs [7][8][9][10]. As there is currently no standardized method for modeling FRC, an inverse analysis based on the software developers' guidelines [39] was employed to derive the post-cracking tensile stress versus fracture strain relationship for FRCs.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the hidden layer, there is no widely recognized method for selecting its number of layers. Researchers need to determine different network structures for specific research problems [49,50]. Based on the preliminary trial calculations and comprehensive consideration of prediction accuracy and training time, two hidden layers were selected in this study.…”
Section: Prediction Model and Parameter Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaussian processes or neural networks are ML approaches. [111], may be used to create surrogate models that simulate intricate and costly computer structural evaluations [67]. The computing complexity of the optimization process is greatly reduced by these surrogate models, which enable quick assessments of the objective function and constraints.…”
Section: Figure 9 Constraints In Rc Frame Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%