1976
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(76)90027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum forage allocation through chance-constrained programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rates can be dependent upon previous state variable values, state variable interactions, and time. In contrast, serial LP models, such as the ones developed by previous authors (Sharp 1967, Bartlett et al 1974, Hunter et al 1976, and Propoi 1979, show production rates which vary only with respect to time. Dynamic optimization models yield a sequence of optimal decision rules useful to decision makers (i.e., range managers).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These rates can be dependent upon previous state variable values, state variable interactions, and time. In contrast, serial LP models, such as the ones developed by previous authors (Sharp 1967, Bartlett et al 1974, Hunter et al 1976, and Propoi 1979, show production rates which vary only with respect to time. Dynamic optimization models yield a sequence of optimal decision rules useful to decision makers (i.e., range managers).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this case, random effects in the coefficients or constraining matrices are included, usually by the replacement of a parameter with some measure of its central tendency and variation. Applications of chance constrained programming include the study of forest management (Thompson and Haynes [1971]), range management (Hunter et al [1976]) and land reclamation (Tyagi and Narayana [1983]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%