Crop Yield Response to Deficit Irrigation 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4752-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum irrigation schedules for cotton under deficit irrigation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barley, barley silage, canola, and soft spring wheat have growth characteristics similar to hard spring wheat, so a k y value of 1.15 was also used for these crops. A seasonal k y value of 1.10 was used for potato (Doorenbos and Kassam, 1979;Ferreira and Goncalves, 2007) and sugar beet (Doorenbos and Kassam, 1979), although a k y value of 1.01 was recently observed for sugar beet in western Europe (Shrestha et al, 2010) and k y values of 1.07 (Moutonnet, 2002) and 1.49 (Anac et al, 1999) have been reported. Hanks (1983) suggested a k y value of 1.05 for alfalfa, since k y values less than 1 are not physically correct and may have resulted from use of limited data and incorrect estimates of ET m and Y m .…”
Section: Yield Response Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barley, barley silage, canola, and soft spring wheat have growth characteristics similar to hard spring wheat, so a k y value of 1.15 was also used for these crops. A seasonal k y value of 1.10 was used for potato (Doorenbos and Kassam, 1979;Ferreira and Goncalves, 2007) and sugar beet (Doorenbos and Kassam, 1979), although a k y value of 1.01 was recently observed for sugar beet in western Europe (Shrestha et al, 2010) and k y values of 1.07 (Moutonnet, 2002) and 1.49 (Anac et al, 1999) have been reported. Hanks (1983) suggested a k y value of 1.05 for alfalfa, since k y values less than 1 are not physically correct and may have resulted from use of limited data and incorrect estimates of ET m and Y m .…”
Section: Yield Response Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In calculating the reference evapotranspiration, the study utilised 10 years (2004 -2014) of monthly maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity, sunshine hour, and wind speed data obtained from the CLIMWAT 2.0 database as no such data were available in the study locations of the three agroecological zones (Anaç et al, 1999). Figure 1 shows the CLIMWAT 2.0 local station distribution in Nigeria.…”
Section: Climatic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, irrigation scheduling based on deficit irrigation requires careful evaluation to ensure enhanced efficient use of increasingly scarce irrigation water in this area. The knowledge of proper irrigation scheduling, when to irrigate and how much water to apply, is essential to optimize crop production per unit water and for sustaining irrigated agriculture on permanent footing (Anac et al, 1999). In many deve-loping countries like Ethiopia, irrigation interval turns are mutually agreed and fixed among growers according to a pre-fixed schedule, this situation is no more different in North Gondar zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%