2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1840-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum loading for maximizing muscle power output: the effect of training history

Abstract: Although the effect of external load on the mechanical output of individual muscle has been well documented, the literature still provides conflicting evidence regarding whether the optimum loading (L(opt)) for exerting the maximum muscle power output (MPO) could be different for individuals with different levels of strength and power. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of training history on L(opt) that maximizes MPO during the 6-s maximal cycling sprint test. Forty healthy young males (strength-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Combat sports, Athletic sprints and Team sports) produced higher P M than control group of athletes that are not characterized with outstanding muscle capacities (in this study labelled as Physically active). The obtained findings are in line with similar studies that show significant differences in P M between strength, speed or power-trained athletes compared to physically active or sedentary individuals (Cuk et al, 2016;Giroux et al, 2016;Pazin et al, 2011). In addition, the higher power-producing capacities of Athletic sprints group in comparison to Team sports group could also be expected since team sports allow slightly reduced muscle capacities compensated by outstanding technical and tactical skills (Reilly, Williams, Nevill, & Franks, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combat sports, Athletic sprints and Team sports) produced higher P M than control group of athletes that are not characterized with outstanding muscle capacities (in this study labelled as Physically active). The obtained findings are in line with similar studies that show significant differences in P M between strength, speed or power-trained athletes compared to physically active or sedentary individuals (Cuk et al, 2016;Giroux et al, 2016;Pazin et al, 2011). In addition, the higher power-producing capacities of Athletic sprints group in comparison to Team sports group could also be expected since team sports allow slightly reduced muscle capacities compensated by outstanding technical and tactical skills (Reilly, Williams, Nevill, & Franks, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Regardless of the generally encouraging results, several potential limitations and directions for future research need to be addressed. Firstly, despite the fact that we applied standard set of loading conditions for testing elite athletes on a leg cycle ergometer (Henry that allows reliable measurements (García Ramos, Torrejón, Morales Artacho, Pérez Castilla, & Jaric, 2017), more precise calculation of P M (Pazin et al, 2011) and decreased bias toward V 0 or F 0 (Pérez-Castilla, Jaric, Feriche, Padial, & García-Ramos, 2017), it is noted that it was relatively narrow. Therefore, further research should evaluate the sensitivity of the F-V relationship conducted over wider loading conditions.…”
Section: Force-velocity Profiles Of Elite Athletes | P R Bozic and Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results showed strength-trained and sedentary participants, respectively, had the highest and lowest forces and power outputs (p < 0.001) (29).…”
Section: Chapter V Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research conducted by Pazin et al (29) examined the influence of the effect of training history on optimum loading for maximizing muscle power output. Forty healthy young males with different levels of strength and power (strength-and speed-trained athletes, physically active, and sedentary non-athletes) were tested during a 6-second maximal cycling sprint test (29).…”
Section: Chapter V Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%