2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum machine learning algorithm selection for forecasting vegetation indices: MODIS NDVI & EVI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vegetation indices (NDVI and EVI) extracted from the 2001 to 2018 MODIS dataset have also been used to forecast their values in 2019 using Vector Regression, Random Forest (RF), and Linear and Polynomial Regression (Roy, 2021). For predicting maize yield from land surface temperature (LST) and NDVI in Pakistan, Ahmad et al (2020a) applied the K-Nearest Neighbor clustering machine learning model.…”
Section: Use Of Machine Learning For Spatiotemporal Data Fusion Ndvi-...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vegetation indices (NDVI and EVI) extracted from the 2001 to 2018 MODIS dataset have also been used to forecast their values in 2019 using Vector Regression, Random Forest (RF), and Linear and Polynomial Regression (Roy, 2021). For predicting maize yield from land surface temperature (LST) and NDVI in Pakistan, Ahmad et al (2020a) applied the K-Nearest Neighbor clustering machine learning model.…”
Section: Use Of Machine Learning For Spatiotemporal Data Fusion Ndvi-...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, CNN and RF display good performance in vegetation growth predictions from NDVI (Ayhan et al, 2020;Li et al, 2021;Mishra and Shahi, 2021;Ferchichi et al, 2022). The performance of machine learning models can be evaluated through a range of approaches, including Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), coefficient of determinates (R 2) , Pearson correlation (R), and structural similarity (SSIM), which have been used by Rhif et al (2020), Ahmad et al (2020b), Arab et al (2021), Htitiou et al (2021), Mishra andShahi (2021), andRoy (2021). Htitiou et al (2021) use NDVI values extracted from spatial transects created across the study site to compare the performance of Very Deep Super-Resolution (VDSR) against the enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (ESTARFM) and the flexible spatiotemporal data fusion (FSDAF) method in producing high resolution NDVI time series datasets.…”
Section: Use Of Machine Learning For Spatiotemporal Data Fusion Ndvi-...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using remotely sensed satellite imagery, a change in surface temperature may be observed, which is an indicator of impervious surface build-up [ 26 ]. The distribution of LST is greatly influenced by the presence of natural vegetation [ 15 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. To study variations in LST, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is often used [ 12 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) methods have been used for downscaling and gap-filling purposes in remote sensing products and can be seen as one tool that may lead to the production of high quality remote sensing products (Zhu et al, 2022;Zeng et al, 2013). Furthermore, ML methods have been successfully applied to a wide range of drought-related (Hauswirth et al, 2021;Shamshirband et al, 2020;Tufaner and Özbeyaz, 2020;Shen et al, 2019;Das et al, 2020;Hauswirth et al, 2022) and remotely sensed vegetation studies (Roy, 2021;Li et al, 2021b;Reichstein et al, 2019). Compared to conventional statistical downscaling techniques, ML is considered the superior alternative; given that no strict statistical assumptions are required, complex and non-linear relationships are well captured and provide high precision (Ebrahimy et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gap-filling can also be achieved by relying on the RF to predict values where data is sparse or missing (Wang et al, 2022). These studies have highlighted that ML methods can accurately predict the dynamics of vegetation (Roy, 2021;Gensheimer et al, 2022). However, studies applying ML methods to global vegetation dynamics concerning drought conditions are less prominent (Li et al, 2021b;Zhang et al, 2021b;Chen et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%